TSTP Solution File: KRS251+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : KRS251+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:12:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 4.31s 1.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  33   ~;  40   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (   0 sgn  37   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(completeness,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ( model(X9,X10)
    <~> model(X9,not(X10)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0gCHFTTFX/E---3.1_20453.p',completeness) ).

fof(csa,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( model(X3,X1)
          & model(X3,not(X2)) )
    <=> status(X1,X2,csa) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0gCHFTTFX/E---3.1_20453.p',csa) ).

fof(thm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( model(X3,X1)
         => model(X3,X2) )
    <=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0gCHFTTFX/E---3.1_20453.p',thm) ).

fof(xora,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ! [X1,X2] :
          ( status(X1,X2,X7)
        <~> status(X1,X2,X8) )
    <=> xora(X7,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0gCHFTTFX/E---3.1_20453.p',xora) ).

fof(xora_csa_thm,conjecture,
    xora(csa,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0gCHFTTFX/E---3.1_20453.p',xora_csa_thm) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] :
      ~ ( model(X9,X10)
      <=> model(X9,not(X10)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[completeness]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ( ~ model(X29,X27)
        | ~ model(X29,not(X28))
        | status(X27,X28,csa) )
      & ( model(esk4_2(X30,X31),X30)
        | ~ status(X30,X31,csa) )
      & ( model(esk4_2(X30,X31),not(X31))
        | ~ status(X30,X31,csa) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[csa])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X54,X55] :
      ( ( ~ model(X54,X55)
        | ~ model(X54,not(X55)) )
      & ( model(X54,X55)
        | model(X54,not(X55)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( status(X2,X3,csa)
    | ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ model(X1,not(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( model(X1,X2)
    | model(X1,not(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X24,X25,X26] :
      ( ( model(esk3_2(X21,X22),X21)
        | status(X21,X22,thm) )
      & ( ~ model(esk3_2(X21,X22),X22)
        | status(X21,X22,thm) )
      & ( ~ status(X24,X25,thm)
        | ~ model(X26,X24)
        | model(X26,X25) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ! [X1,X2] :
          ~ ( status(X1,X2,X7)
          <=> status(X1,X2,X8) )
    <=> xora(X7,X8) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[xora]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,csa)
    | model(X3,X2)
    | ~ model(X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | status(X1,X2,thm) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20] :
      ( ( ~ status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)
        | status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)
        | xora(X11,X12) )
      & ( ~ status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)
        | status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)
        | xora(X11,X12) )
      & ( ~ status(X17,X18,X15)
        | ~ status(X17,X18,X16)
        | ~ xora(X15,X16) )
      & ( status(X19,X20,X15)
        | status(X19,X20,X16)
        | ~ xora(X15,X16) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | ~ model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | status(X1,X3,csa)
    | model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ xora(csa,thm),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[xora_csa_thm])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | xora(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,csa)
    | status(X1,X2,thm) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ xora(csa,thm),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( xora(csa,X1)
    | status(esk1_2(csa,X1),esk2_2(csa,X1),thm)
    | status(esk1_2(csa,X1),esk2_2(csa,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ xora(csa,thm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | xora(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    status(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm),thm),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( model(X3,X2)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
    | ~ model(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( model(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,csa) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    status(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm),csa),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( model(esk4_2(X1,X2),not(X2))
    | ~ status(X1,X2,csa) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( model(X1,esk2_2(csa,thm))
    | ~ model(X1,esk1_2(csa,thm)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    model(esk4_2(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm)),esk1_2(csa,thm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ model(X1,not(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    model(esk4_2(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm)),not(esk2_2(csa,thm))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    model(esk4_2(esk1_2(csa,thm),esk2_2(csa,thm)),esk2_2(csa,thm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13  % Problem    : KRS251+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 13:42:42 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.I0gCHFTTFX/E---3.1_20453.p
% 4.31/1.03  # Version: 3.1.0
% 4.31/1.03  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.31/1.03  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # new_bool_1 with pid 20607 completed with status 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 4.31/1.03  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.31/1.03  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.31/1.03  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 4.31/1.03  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 131s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with pid 20610 completed with status 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Result found by G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S
% 4.31/1.03  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.31/1.03  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.31/1.03  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 4.31/1.03  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 4.31/1.03  # Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 131s (1) cores
% 4.31/1.03  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 4.31/1.03  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.31/1.03  
% 4.31/1.03  # Proof found!
% 4.31/1.03  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.31/1.03  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.31/1.03  # Parsed axioms                        : 33
% 4.31/1.03  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 21
% 4.31/1.03  # Initial clauses                      : 30
% 4.31/1.03  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 4.31/1.03  # Processed clauses                    : 5034
% 4.31/1.03  # ...of these trivial                  : 527
% 4.31/1.03  # ...subsumed                          : 2565
% 4.31/1.03  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1942
% 4.31/1.03  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Backward-subsumed                    : 22
% 4.31/1.03  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 4.31/1.03  # Generated clauses                    : 52380
% 4.31/1.03  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46478
% 4.31/1.03  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Paramodulations                      : 52292
% 4.31/1.03  # Factorizations                       : 88
% 4.31/1.03  # NegExts                              : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Total rewrite steps                  : 6557
% 4.31/1.03  # ...of those cached                   : 5963
% 4.31/1.03  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 4.31/1.03  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 4.31/1.03  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 4.31/1.03  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 4.31/1.03  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 4.31/1.03  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1888
% 4.31/1.03  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 346
% 4.31/1.03  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.31/1.03  #    Negative unit clauses             : 66
% 4.31/1.03  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1476
% 4.31/1.03  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41187
% 4.31/1.03  # ...number of literals in the above   : 121592
% 4.31/1.03  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 4.31/1.03  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 215327
% 4.31/1.03  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 130191
% 4.31/1.03  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2582
% 4.31/1.03  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7853
% 4.31/1.03  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2147
% 4.31/1.03  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 4.31/1.03  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.31/1.03  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 663389
% 4.31/1.03  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 587
% 4.31/1.03  
% 4.31/1.03  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.31/1.03  # User time                : 0.496 s
% 4.31/1.03  # System time              : 0.020 s
% 4.31/1.03  # Total time               : 0.516 s
% 4.31/1.03  # Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages
% 4.31/1.03  
% 4.31/1.03  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.31/1.03  # User time                : 0.499 s
% 4.31/1.03  # System time              : 0.021 s
% 4.31/1.03  # Total time               : 0.520 s
% 4.31/1.03  # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 4.31/1.03  % E---3.1 exiting
% 4.31/1.03  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------