TSTP Solution File: KRS235+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS235+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.82s 2.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (   8 unt;   4 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  16 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(noc,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ( nevera(X1,X2)
    | status(esk22_2(X1,X2),esk23_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( model(esk25_2(X1,X2),not(X2))
    | ~ status(X1,X2,noc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    ( nevera(X1,X2)
    | status(esk22_2(X1,X2),esk23_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).

cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    ( ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ model(X1,not(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_76,plain,
    ( model(X1,X2)
    | ~ model(X1,X3)
    | ~ status(X3,X2,thm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_76) ).

cnf(i_0_40,plain,
    ( model(esk25_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,noc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wyqodeg2/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).

cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
    ~ nevera(noc,thm),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( nevera(X1,X2)
    | status(esk22_2(X1,X2),esk23_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( model(esk25_2(X1,X2),not(X2))
    | ~ status(X1,X2,noc) ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
    status(esk22_2(noc,thm),esk23_2(noc,thm),noc),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( nevera(X1,X2)
    | status(esk22_2(X1,X2),esk23_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ model(X1,not(X2)) ),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    model(esk25_2(esk22_2(noc,thm),esk23_2(noc,thm)),not(esk23_2(noc,thm))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ( model(X1,X2)
    | ~ model(X1,X3)
    | ~ status(X3,X2,thm) ),
    i_0_76 ).

cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
    status(esk22_2(noc,thm),esk23_2(noc,thm),thm),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_88]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,plain,
    ( model(esk25_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ status(X1,X2,noc) ),
    i_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ~ model(esk25_2(esk22_2(noc,thm),esk23_2(noc,thm)),esk23_2(noc,thm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( model(X1,esk23_2(noc,thm))
    | ~ model(X1,esk22_2(noc,thm)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,plain,
    model(esk25_2(esk22_2(noc,thm),esk23_2(noc,thm)),esk22_2(noc,thm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_96])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : KRS235+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 15:50:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.82/2.44  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.82/2.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.82/2.44  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.82/2.44  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YA
% 7.82/2.44  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.82/2.44  #
% 7.82/2.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.82/2.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.82/2.44  
% 7.82/2.44  # Proof found!
% 7.82/2.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.82/2.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.82/2.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.82/2.44  
% 7.82/2.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.82/2.44  # User time                : 0.076 s
% 7.82/2.44  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.82/2.44  # Total time               : 0.083 s
% 7.82/2.44  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.82/2.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------