TSTP Solution File: KRS192+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS192+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:32:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.33s 2.50s
% Output   : Proof 2.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : KRS192+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 17:20:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.33/2.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.33/2.50  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.33/2.50  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.33/2.50  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.33/2.50  1. (status T_0 T_1 (wth)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (wth)))   ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.50  2. (-. (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1)))) (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1)))   ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.50  3. ((Ex I1, (model I1 T_0)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 T_1) /\ (-. (model I3 T_0)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 T_1)))))) (-. (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))))   ### ConjTree 2
% 2.33/2.50  4. (((Ex I1, (model I1 T_0)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 T_1) /\ (-. (model I3 T_0)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 T_1)))))) <=> (status T_0 T_1 (wth))) (-. (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1)))) (status T_0 T_1 (wth))   ### Equiv 1 3
% 2.33/2.50  5. (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 T_0)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 T_0)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status T_0 C (wth)))) (status T_0 T_1 (wth)) (-. (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))))   ### All 4
% 2.33/2.50  6. (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth))))) (-. (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1)))) (status T_0 T_1 (wth))   ### All 5
% 2.33/2.50  7. (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (status T_0 T_1 (thm))   ### Axiom
% 2.33/2.50  8. ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))) <=> (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (status T_0 T_1 (wth)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth)))))   ### Equiv 6 7
% 2.33/2.50  9. (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (thm)))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth))))) (status T_0 T_1 (wth)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm)))   ### All 8
% 2.33/2.50  10. (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (status T_0 T_1 (wth)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth)))))   ### All 9
% 2.33/2.50  11. (-. ((status T_0 T_1 (wth)) => (status T_0 T_1 (thm)))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm)))))   ### NotImply 10
% 2.33/2.50  12. (-. (All C, ((status T_0 C (wth)) => (status T_0 C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth)))))   ### NotAllEx 11
% 2.33/2.50  13. (-. (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C (wth)) => (status Ax C (thm)))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm)))))   ### NotAllEx 12
% 2.33/2.50  14. (-. (isa (wth) (thm))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) /\ ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) /\ ((Ex I3, ((model I3 C) /\ (-. (model I3 Ax)))) /\ (Ex I4, (-. (model I4 C)))))) <=> (status Ax C (wth)))))   ### Definition-Pseudo(isa) 13
% 2.33/2.50  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.33/2.50  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------