TSTP Solution File: KRS188+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : KRS188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:51:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 10.75s 2.25s
% Output : Proof 12.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KRS188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:09:12 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.62 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.62 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.62 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.65 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.40/1.17 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.40/1.17 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.40/1.21 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.40/1.21 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.40/1.21 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.40/1.22 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.40/1.22 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 8.48/1.94 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 8.48/1.94 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 9.39/2.04 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.55/2.05 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 9.55/2.05 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.82/2.09 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.82/2.11 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.75/2.24 Prover 3: proved (1593ms)
% 10.75/2.24
% 10.75/2.25 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.75/2.25
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 5: stopped
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 0: stopped
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 6: stopped
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 10.75/2.25 Prover 2: stopped
% 10.75/2.26 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 11.13/2.27 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 11.13/2.30 Prover 1: Found proof (size 25)
% 11.13/2.30 Prover 1: proved (1656ms)
% 11.13/2.30 Prover 4: stopped
% 11.13/2.30 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 11.13/2.32 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 11.13/2.33 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 11.13/2.33 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 11.74/2.35 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 11.74/2.38 Prover 7: stopped
% 11.74/2.38 Prover 13: stopped
% 11.98/2.39 Prover 10: stopped
% 11.98/2.41 Prover 11: stopped
% 12.35/2.49 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.35/2.51 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.35/2.52 Prover 8: stopped
% 12.35/2.52
% 12.35/2.52 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.35/2.52
% 12.35/2.52 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.35/2.53 Assumptions after simplification:
% 12.35/2.53 ---------------------------------
% 12.35/2.53
% 12.35/2.53 (isa)
% 12.35/2.56 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (isa(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 12.35/2.56 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 =
% 12.35/2.56 0) & status(v3, v4, v1) = v5 & status(v3, v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 12.35/2.56 $i(v3))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (isa(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) |
% 12.35/2.56 ~ $i(v0) | ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (status(v2, v3, v0) = 0) | ~
% 12.35/2.56 $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | status(v2, v3, v1) = 0))
% 12.35/2.56
% 12.35/2.56 (isa_wec_thm)
% 12.35/2.56 $i(wec) & $i(thm) & ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & isa(wec, thm) = v0)
% 12.35/2.56
% 12.35/2.56 (thm)
% 12.35/2.56 $i(thm) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (status(v0,
% 12.35/2.56 v1, thm) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: int] : (
% 12.35/2.56 ~ (v4 = 0) & model(v3, v1) = v4 & model(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) & ! [v0:
% 12.35/2.56 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (status(v0, v1, thm) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.35/2.56 ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (model(v2, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | model(v2, v1) = 0))
% 12.35/2.56
% 12.35/2.56 (wec)
% 12.35/2.57 $i(wec) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (status(v0,
% 12.35/2.57 v1, wec) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: int] : (
% 12.35/2.57 ~ (v4 = 0) & model(v3, v1) = v4 & model(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)) | ! [v3:
% 12.35/2.57 $i] : ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 | ~ (model(v3, v0) = v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ?
% 12.35/2.57 [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & model(v3, v1) = v5)) | ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 12.35/2.57 (model(v3, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v3))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 12.35/2.57 (status(v0, v1, wec) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ( ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 12.35/2.57 (model(v2, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | model(v2, v1) = 0) & ? [v2: $i] : ?
% 12.35/2.57 [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & model(v2, v1) = 0 & model(v2, v0) = v3 &
% 12.35/2.57 $i(v2)) & ? [v2: $i] : (model(v2, v0) = 0 & $i(v2))))
% 12.35/2.57
% 12.35/2.57 (function-axioms)
% 12.35/2.57 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 12.35/2.57 [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (status(v4, v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.35/2.57 (status(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 12.35/2.57 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (xora(v3, v2)
% 12.35/2.57 = v1) | ~ (xora(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 12.35/2.57 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (nevera(v3,
% 12.35/2.57 v2) = v1) | ~ (nevera(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 12.35/2.57 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (nota(v3,
% 12.35/2.57 v2) = v1) | ~ (nota(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 12.35/2.57 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (isa(v3,
% 12.35/2.57 v2) = v1) | ~ (isa(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 12.35/2.57 [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 12.35/2.57 (mighta(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (mighta(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 12.35/2.57 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 12.35/2.57 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (model(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (model(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i]
% 12.35/2.57 : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (not(v2) = v1) | ~ (not(v2) =
% 12.35/2.57 v0))
% 12.35/2.57
% 12.35/2.57 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 12.35/2.57 --------------------------------------------
% 12.35/2.57 cax, completeness, contradiction, csa, eqv, esa, eth, mighta, mixed_pair,
% 12.35/2.57 nevera, noc, non_thm_spt, not, nota, sap, sat, sat_non_taut_pair, satisfiable,
% 12.35/2.57 sca, tac, tau, tautology, tca, unp, uns, wca, wtc, wth, xora
% 12.35/2.57
% 12.35/2.57 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 12.35/2.57 ---------------------------------
% 12.35/2.57
% 12.35/2.57 Begin of proof
% 12.93/2.57 |
% 12.93/2.57 | ALPHA: (thm) implies:
% 12.93/2.57 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (status(v0, v1,
% 12.93/2.57 | thm) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: int] :
% 12.93/2.57 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & model(v3, v1) = v4 & model(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 12.93/2.57 |
% 12.93/2.57 | ALPHA: (wec) implies:
% 12.93/2.58 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (status(v0, v1, wec) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) |
% 12.93/2.58 | ~ $i(v0) | ( ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (model(v2, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) |
% 12.93/2.58 | model(v2, v1) = 0) & ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 12.93/2.58 | model(v2, v1) = 0 & model(v2, v0) = v3 & $i(v2)) & ? [v2: $i] :
% 12.93/2.58 | (model(v2, v0) = 0 & $i(v2))))
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | ALPHA: (isa) implies:
% 12.93/2.58 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (isa(v0, v1) =
% 12.93/2.58 | v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5:
% 12.93/2.58 | int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & status(v3, v4, v1) = v5 & status(v3, v4, v0)
% 12.93/2.58 | = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3)))
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | ALPHA: (isa_wec_thm) implies:
% 12.93/2.58 | (4) $i(thm)
% 12.93/2.58 | (5) $i(wec)
% 12.93/2.58 | (6) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & isa(wec, thm) = v0)
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.93/2.58 | (7) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 12.93/2.58 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (model(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (model(v3, v2) =
% 12.93/2.58 | v0))
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | DELTA: instantiating (6) with fresh symbol all_30_0 gives:
% 12.93/2.58 | (8) ~ (all_30_0 = 0) & isa(wec, thm) = all_30_0
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 12.93/2.58 | (9) ~ (all_30_0 = 0)
% 12.93/2.58 | (10) isa(wec, thm) = all_30_0
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with wec, thm, all_30_0, simplifying with (4),
% 12.93/2.58 | (5), (10) gives:
% 12.93/2.58 | (11) all_30_0 = 0 | ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0)
% 12.93/2.58 | & status(v0, v1, wec) = 0 & status(v0, v1, thm) = v2 & $i(v1) &
% 12.93/2.58 | $i(v0))
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | BETA: splitting (11) gives:
% 12.93/2.58 |
% 12.93/2.58 | Case 1:
% 12.93/2.58 | |
% 12.93/2.58 | | (12) all_30_0 = 0
% 12.93/2.58 | |
% 12.93/2.58 | | REDUCE: (9), (12) imply:
% 12.93/2.58 | | (13) $false
% 12.93/2.58 | |
% 12.93/2.58 | | CLOSE: (13) is inconsistent.
% 12.93/2.58 | |
% 12.93/2.58 | Case 2:
% 12.93/2.58 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | (14) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & status(v0,
% 12.93/2.59 | | v1, wec) = 0 & status(v0, v1, thm) = v2 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | DELTA: instantiating (14) with fresh symbols all_73_0, all_73_1, all_73_2
% 12.93/2.59 | | gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | | (15) ~ (all_73_0 = 0) & status(all_73_2, all_73_1, wec) = 0 &
% 12.93/2.59 | | status(all_73_2, all_73_1, thm) = all_73_0 & $i(all_73_1) &
% 12.93/2.59 | | $i(all_73_2)
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | ALPHA: (15) implies:
% 12.93/2.59 | | (16) ~ (all_73_0 = 0)
% 12.93/2.59 | | (17) $i(all_73_2)
% 12.93/2.59 | | (18) $i(all_73_1)
% 12.93/2.59 | | (19) status(all_73_2, all_73_1, thm) = all_73_0
% 12.93/2.59 | | (20) status(all_73_2, all_73_1, wec) = 0
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_73_2, all_73_1, all_73_0,
% 12.93/2.59 | | simplifying with (17), (18), (19) gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | | (21) all_73_0 = 0 | ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & model(v0,
% 12.93/2.59 | | all_73_1) = v1 & model(v0, all_73_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_73_2, all_73_1, simplifying with
% 12.93/2.59 | | (17), (18), (20) gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | | (22) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (model(v0, all_73_2) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | model(v0,
% 12.93/2.59 | | all_73_1) = 0) & ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 12.93/2.59 | | model(v0, all_73_1) = 0 & model(v0, all_73_2) = v1 & $i(v0)) & ?
% 12.93/2.59 | | [v0: $i] : (model(v0, all_73_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 12.93/2.59 | | (23) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (model(v0, all_73_2) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | model(v0,
% 12.93/2.59 | | all_73_1) = 0)
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | BETA: splitting (21) gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | Case 1:
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (24) all_73_0 = 0
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | REDUCE: (16), (24) imply:
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (25) $false
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | CLOSE: (25) is inconsistent.
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | Case 2:
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (26) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & model(v0, all_73_1) =
% 12.93/2.59 | | | v1 & model(v0, all_73_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | DELTA: instantiating (26) with fresh symbols all_89_0, all_89_1 gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (27) ~ (all_89_0 = 0) & model(all_89_1, all_73_1) = all_89_0 &
% 12.93/2.59 | | | model(all_89_1, all_73_2) = 0 & $i(all_89_1)
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | ALPHA: (27) implies:
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (28) ~ (all_89_0 = 0)
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (29) $i(all_89_1)
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (30) model(all_89_1, all_73_2) = 0
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (31) model(all_89_1, all_73_1) = all_89_0
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (23) with all_89_1, simplifying with (29), (30)
% 12.93/2.59 | | | gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (32) model(all_89_1, all_73_1) = 0
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_89_0, 0, all_73_1, all_89_1,
% 12.93/2.59 | | | simplifying with (31), (32) gives:
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (33) all_89_0 = 0
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | REDUCE: (28), (33) imply:
% 12.93/2.59 | | | (34) $false
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | | CLOSE: (34) is inconsistent.
% 12.93/2.59 | | |
% 12.93/2.59 | | End of split
% 12.93/2.59 | |
% 12.93/2.59 | End of split
% 12.93/2.59 |
% 12.93/2.59 End of proof
% 12.93/2.59 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.93/2.59
% 12.93/2.59 1974ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------