TSTP Solution File: KRS188+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:12:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 75 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 19 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 83 ( 28 ~; 32 |; 15 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 0 sgn 31 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(wec,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
& ! [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
=> model(X4,X2) )
& ? [X5] :
( model(X5,X2)
& ~ model(X5,X1) ) )
<=> status(X1,X2,wec) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oAjkOm4mZL/E---3.1_1791.p',wec) ).
fof(isa,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
=> status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> isa(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oAjkOm4mZL/E---3.1_1791.p',isa) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oAjkOm4mZL/E---3.1_1791.p',thm) ).
fof(isa_wec_thm,conjecture,
isa(wec,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oAjkOm4mZL/E---3.1_1791.p',isa_wec_thm) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
& ! [X4] :
( model(X4,X1)
=> model(X4,X2) )
& ? [X5] :
( model(X5,X2)
& ~ model(X5,X1) ) )
<=> status(X1,X2,wec) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[wec]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X25,X26,X27,X29,X30,X31,X33] :
( ( model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X25)
| ~ model(X27,X25)
| ~ model(X29,X26)
| model(X29,X25)
| status(X25,X26,wec) )
& ( ~ model(esk4_2(X25,X26),X26)
| ~ model(X27,X25)
| ~ model(X29,X26)
| model(X29,X25)
| status(X25,X26,wec) )
& ( model(esk5_2(X30,X31),X30)
| ~ status(X30,X31,wec) )
& ( ~ model(X33,X30)
| model(X33,X31)
| ~ status(X30,X31,wec) )
& ( model(esk6_2(X30,X31),X31)
| ~ status(X30,X31,wec) )
& ( ~ model(esk6_2(X30,X31),X30)
| ~ status(X30,X31,wec) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X11,X12,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
( ( status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X11)
| isa(X11,X12) )
& ( ~ status(esk1_2(X11,X12),esk2_2(X11,X12),X12)
| isa(X11,X12) )
& ( ~ isa(X15,X16)
| ~ status(X17,X18,X15)
| status(X17,X18,X16) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[isa])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X19,X20,X22,X23,X24] :
( ( model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X19)
| status(X19,X20,thm) )
& ( ~ model(esk3_2(X19,X20),X20)
| status(X19,X20,thm) )
& ( ~ status(X22,X23,thm)
| ~ model(X24,X22)
| model(X24,X23) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( model(X1,X3)
| ~ model(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X2,X3,wec) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
| isa(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( isa(wec,X1)
| model(X2,esk2_2(wec,X1))
| ~ model(X2,esk1_2(wec,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wec,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[isa_wec_thm])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( isa(wec,X1)
| status(X2,esk2_2(wec,X1),thm)
| ~ model(esk3_2(X2,esk2_2(wec,X1)),esk1_2(wec,X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
| status(X1,X2,thm) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wec,thm),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( isa(wec,X1)
| status(esk1_2(wec,X1),esk2_2(wec,X1),thm) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wec,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.13 % Problem : KRS188+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 14:02:22 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oAjkOm4mZL/E---3.1_1791.p
% 0.23/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # new_bool_3 with pid 1878 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.54 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1882 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.54 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 # partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.23/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.23/0.54 # Initial clauses : 28
% 0.23/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28
% 0.23/0.54 # Processed clauses : 256
% 0.23/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # ...subsumed : 89
% 0.23/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 167
% 0.23/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.23/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.23/0.54 # Generated clauses : 701
% 0.23/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 589
% 0.23/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 0.23/0.54 # Paramodulations : 701
% 0.23/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 139
% 0.23/0.54 # ...of those cached : 106
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 123
% 0.23/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.23/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 96
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 346
% 0.23/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 1531
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.23/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1159
% 0.23/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 791
% 0.23/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 101
% 0.23/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 0.23/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.23/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 13824
% 0.23/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 588
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.23/0.54 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1908 pages
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/0.54 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.23/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.23/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.23/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------