TSTP Solution File: KRS187+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS187+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.70s 2.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   6 unt;   2 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   22 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(tac,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-datkkhpb/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-datkkhpb/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-datkkhpb/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_66,plain,
    ( model(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(X3,X2,tac) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-datkkhpb/lgb.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_77,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-datkkhpb/lgb.p',i_0_77) ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(tac,thm),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( model(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(X3,X2,tac) ),
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
    status(esk13_2(tac,thm),esk14_2(tac,thm),tac),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
    ~ status(esk13_2(tac,thm),esk14_2(tac,thm),thm),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_77 ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    model(X1,esk14_2(tac,thm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]),c_0_90])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : KRS187+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 14:04:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.46  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.70/2.55  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.70/2.55  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.70/2.55  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.70/2.55  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YA
% 7.70/2.55  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.70/2.55  #
% 7.70/2.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 7.70/2.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.70/2.55  
% 7.70/2.55  # Proof found!
% 7.70/2.55  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.70/2.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.70/2.55  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.70/2.55  
% 7.70/2.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.70/2.55  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 7.70/2.55  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 7.70/2.55  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 7.70/2.55  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.70/2.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------