TSTP Solution File: KRS180+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : KRS180+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:34 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : KRS180+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 01:59:21 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.50  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.15/0.54  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.54  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.15/0.54  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.15/0.54  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.15/0.54  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.15/0.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  % File     : KRS180+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.15/0.54  % Domain   : Knowledge Representation
% 0.15/0.54  % Problem  : isa is incompatible with nota, nevera, and xora
% 0.15/0.54  % Version  : [Sut08] axioms.
% 0.15/0.54  % English  :
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % Refs     : [Sut08] Sutcliffe (2008), The SZS Ontologies for Automated Rea
% 0.15/0.54  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.15/0.54  % Names    :
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.15/0.54  % Rating   : 0.13 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.29 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0
% 0.15/0.54  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Number of connectives :   38 (  11   ~;   3   |;  12   &)
% 0.15/0.54  %                                         (   6 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   7 avg)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   7 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.15/0.54  %            Number of variables   :   49 (  25   !;  24   ?)
% 0.15/0.54  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % Comments :
% 0.15/0.54  % Bugfixes : v5.4.0 - Added missing axiom in KRS001+1.ax
% 0.15/0.54  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  %----Include SZS success ontology node relationships
% 0.15/0.54  include('Axioms/KRS001+1.ax').
% 0.15/0.54  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  fof(isa_exclusive,conjecture,
% 0.15/0.54      ! [S1,S2] :
% 0.15/0.54      ? [Ax,C] :
% 0.15/0.54        ( status(Ax,C,S1)
% 0.15/0.54       => ~ ( isa(S1,S2)
% 0.15/0.54            & ( nota(S1,S2)
% 0.15/0.54              | nevera(S1,S2)
% 0.15/0.54              | xora(S1,S2) ) ) ) ).
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54  % Proof found
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.15/0.54  %ClaNum:38(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.15/0.54  %VarNum:142(SingletonVarNum:53)
% 0.15/0.55  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.15/0.55  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.15/0.55  %SharedTerms:37
% 0.15/0.55  %goalClause: 1 10 17
% 0.15/0.55  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.15/0.55  [1]P1(a1,a22)
% 0.15/0.55  [2]P2(a2,a3)
% 0.15/0.55  [3]P2(a6,a7)
% 0.15/0.55  [4]P2(a6,a10)
% 0.15/0.55  [5]P2(a11,a12)
% 0.15/0.55  [6]P2(a16,a15)
% 0.15/0.55  [7]P2(a17,a19)
% 0.15/0.55  [8]P2(a20,a21)
% 0.15/0.55  [11]~P2(a8,a3)
% 0.15/0.55  [12]~P2(a16,a12)
% 0.15/0.55  [13]~P2(a18,a15)
% 0.15/0.55  [14]~P2(a17,a21)
% 0.15/0.55  [9]P2(x91,a4)
% 0.15/0.55  [15]~P2(x151,a9)
% 0.15/0.55  [10]P4(x101,x102,a1)
% 0.15/0.55  [20]~P2(a13,a7)+~P2(a13,a10)
% 0.15/0.55  [16]~P2(x161,a12)+P2(x161,a15)
% 0.15/0.55  [19]P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,f24(x192))
% 0.15/0.55  [22]~P2(x221,x222)+~P2(x221,f24(x222))
% 0.15/0.55  [23]P1(x231,x232)+P4(f25(x231,x232),f26(x231,x232),x231)
% 0.15/0.55  [24]P6(x241,x242)+P4(f27(x241,x242),f30(x241,x242),x242)
% 0.15/0.55  [25]P6(x251,x252)+P4(f27(x251,x252),f30(x251,x252),x251)
% 0.15/0.55  [26]~P3(x261,x262)+P4(f14(x261,x262),f23(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.15/0.55  [27]~P3(x271,x272)+P4(f14(x271,x272),f23(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.15/0.55  [28]~P5(x281,x282)+P4(f28(x281,x282),f29(x281,x282),x281)
% 0.15/0.55  [32]P1(x321,x322)+~P4(f25(x321,x322),f26(x321,x322),x322)
% 0.15/0.55  [34]~P5(x341,x342)+~P4(f28(x341,x342),f29(x341,x342),x342)
% 0.15/0.55  [17]P5(a1,a22)+P6(a1,a22)+P7(a1,a22)
% 0.15/0.55  [37]P7(x371,x372)+P4(f31(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x372)+~P4(f31(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x371)
% 0.15/0.55  [38]P7(x381,x382)+P4(f31(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x381)+~P4(f31(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x382)
% 0.15/0.55  [29]~P7(x294,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x294)
% 0.15/0.55  [30]~P4(x303,x304,x301)+P5(x301,x302)+P4(x303,x304,x302)
% 0.15/0.55  [31]~P4(x311,x312,x314)+P4(x311,x312,x313)+~P1(x314,x313)
% 0.15/0.55  [33]~P4(x333,x334,x331)+P3(x331,x332)+~P4(x333,x334,x332)
% 0.15/0.55  [35]~P4(x353,x354,x351)+~P6(x351,x352)+~P4(x353,x354,x352)
% 0.15/0.55  [36]~P4(x363,x364,x361)+~P7(x361,x362)+~P4(x363,x364,x362)
% 0.15/0.55  %EqnAxiom
% 0.15/0.55  
% 0.15/0.55  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     (P4(x401,x402,a1)),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(rename_variables,[],[10])).
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(42,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     (P4(x421,x422,a1)),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(rename_variables,[],[10])).
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(50,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     (P4(x501,x502,a22)),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10,40,42,34,32,36,35,33,31])).
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(64,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     (~P5(x641,a22)),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[50,34])).
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(70,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     (P7(a1,a22)+P6(a1,a22)),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[64,17])).
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     (P6(a1,a22)),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[50,10,70,36])).
% 0.15/0.55  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.15/0.55     ($false),
% 0.15/0.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[71,50,10,36,35]),
% 0.15/0.55     ['proof']).
% 0.15/0.55  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.15/0.55  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------