TSTP Solution File: KRS179+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:06:13 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % File : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.20/0.64 % Domain : Knowledge Representation
% 0.20/0.64 % Problem : If S1 isa S2 and S1 is nota S3, then S2 is nota S3
% 0.20/0.64 % Version : [Sut08] axioms.
% 0.20/0.64 % English :
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Refs : [Sut08] Sutcliffe (2008), The SZS Ontologies for Automated Rea
% 0.20/0.64 % Source : [TPTP]
% 0.20/0.64 % Names :
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.64 % Rating : 0.20 v8.1.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.12 v7.3.0, 0.29 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.4.0
% 0.20/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of connectives : 35 ( 10 ~; 1 |; 12 &)
% 0.20/0.64 % ( 6 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 2 <~>)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 6 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of variables : 48 ( 26 !; 22 ?)
% 0.20/0.64 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.64 % Bugfixes : v5.4.0 - Added missing axiom in KRS001+1.ax
% 0.20/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %----Include SZS success ontology node relationships
% 0.20/0.64 include('Axioms/KRS001+1.ax').
% 0.20/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 fof(isa_transitive,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.64 ! [S1,S2,S3] :
% 0.20/0.64 ( ( isa(S1,S2)
% 0.20/0.64 & isa(S2,S3) )
% 0.20/0.64 => isa(S1,S3) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.64 %ClaNum:38(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.64 %VarNum:140(SingletonVarNum:51)
% 0.20/0.64 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.64 %SharedTerms:37
% 0.20/0.64 %goalClause: 1 2 11
% 0.20/0.64 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.20/0.64 [1]P1(a1,a22)
% 0.20/0.64 [2]P1(a22,a24)
% 0.20/0.64 [3]P2(a2,a3)
% 0.20/0.64 [4]P2(a6,a7)
% 0.20/0.64 [5]P2(a6,a10)
% 0.20/0.64 [6]P2(a11,a12)
% 0.20/0.64 [7]P2(a16,a15)
% 0.20/0.64 [8]P2(a17,a19)
% 0.20/0.64 [9]P2(a20,a21)
% 0.20/0.64 [11]~P1(a1,a24)
% 0.20/0.64 [12]~P2(a8,a3)
% 0.20/0.64 [13]~P2(a16,a12)
% 0.20/0.64 [14]~P2(a18,a15)
% 0.20/0.64 [15]~P2(a17,a21)
% 0.20/0.64 [10]P2(x101,a4)
% 0.20/0.64 [16]~P2(x161,a9)
% 0.20/0.64 [20]~P2(a13,a7)+~P2(a13,a10)
% 0.20/0.64 [17]~P2(x171,a12)+P2(x171,a15)
% 0.20/0.64 [19]P2(x191,x192)+P2(x191,f25(x192))
% 0.20/0.64 [22]~P2(x221,x222)+~P2(x221,f25(x222))
% 0.20/0.64 [23]P1(x231,x232)+P4(f26(x231,x232),f27(x231,x232),x231)
% 0.20/0.64 [24]P5(x241,x242)+P4(f28(x241,x242),f31(x241,x242),x242)
% 0.20/0.64 [25]P5(x251,x252)+P4(f28(x251,x252),f31(x251,x252),x251)
% 0.20/0.64 [26]~P3(x261,x262)+P4(f14(x261,x262),f23(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.20/0.64 [27]~P3(x271,x272)+P4(f14(x271,x272),f23(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.20/0.64 [28]~P6(x281,x282)+P4(f29(x281,x282),f30(x281,x282),x281)
% 0.20/0.64 [32]P1(x321,x322)+~P4(f26(x321,x322),f27(x321,x322),x322)
% 0.20/0.64 [34]~P6(x341,x342)+~P4(f29(x341,x342),f30(x341,x342),x342)
% 0.20/0.64 [37]P7(x371,x372)+P4(f32(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x372)+~P4(f32(x371,x372),f5(x371,x372),x371)
% 0.20/0.64 [38]P7(x381,x382)+P4(f32(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x381)+~P4(f32(x381,x382),f5(x381,x382),x382)
% 0.20/0.64 [29]~P7(x294,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x293)+P4(x291,x292,x294)
% 0.20/0.64 [30]~P4(x303,x304,x301)+P6(x301,x302)+P4(x303,x304,x302)
% 0.20/0.64 [31]~P4(x311,x312,x314)+P4(x311,x312,x313)+~P1(x314,x313)
% 0.20/0.64 [33]~P4(x333,x334,x331)+P3(x331,x332)+~P4(x333,x334,x332)
% 0.20/0.64 [35]~P4(x353,x354,x351)+~P5(x351,x352)+~P4(x353,x354,x352)
% 0.20/0.64 [36]~P4(x363,x364,x361)+~P7(x361,x362)+~P4(x363,x364,x362)
% 0.20/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 (P4(f26(a1,a24),f27(a1,a24),a1)),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,32,23])).
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(43,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 (~P5(a1,a1)),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,32,23,36,35])).
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(45,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 (P3(a1,a1)),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,32,23,36,35,33])).
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(47,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 (P6(a1,a24)),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,32,23,36,35,33,30])).
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(49,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 (~P4(f26(a1,a24),f27(a1,a24),a22)),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,11,32,23,36,35,33,30,31])).
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(68,plain,
% 0.20/0.64 ($false),
% 0.20/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,49,40,43,45,47,34,28,27,25,29,31]),
% 0.20/0.64 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.64 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------