TSTP Solution File: KRS173+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS173+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:12:27 EDT 2024
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.11s 0.39s
% Output : Saturation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_10)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( xsd_integer(X1)
| xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( cperson(X1)
| ~ rparent(X1,X2)
| ~ cperson(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( rparent(X1,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cperson(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( cperson(esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cperson(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ rparent(ifred,i2003_11_14_17_14_14998)
| ~ rparent(i2003_11_14_17_14_14998,i2003_11_14_17_14_14920) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
cperson(ifred),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : KRS173+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:53:09 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Dp2hY7SEMp/E---3.1_1086.p
% 0.11/0.39 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # new_bool_3 with pid 1209 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.39 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.39 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1212 completed with status 1
% 0.11/0.39 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.39 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 # No proof found!
% 0.11/0.39 # SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.11/0.39 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.11/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.11/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.11/0.39 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.11/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.11/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.11/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Generated clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.11/0.39 # Paramodulations : 2
% 0.11/0.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.11/0.39 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.11/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.11/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.11/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.11/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.11/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 799
% 0.11/0.39 # Search garbage collected termcells : 185
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.39 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.39 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.39 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.11/0.39 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.11/0.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------