TSTP Solution File: KRS165+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : KRS165+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : KRS165+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 19:25:06 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34 Tue Jun 7 19:25:06 2022
% 0.11/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 17872.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 formula_list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.11/0.34 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.11/0.34 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34
% 0.11/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.11/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.11/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.11/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 0.11/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 14
% 0.11/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.11/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.11/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.11/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.11/0.38 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.11/0.38 distinct function count: 0
% 0.11/0.38 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Model 3 [ 1 1 149 ] (0.00 seconds, 4469 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Model 4 [ 1 1 81 ] (0.00 seconds, 2925 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Model 5 [ 2 0 162 ] (0.00 seconds, 2541 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.07 sec ----> 40 [hyper,39,2,38] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Length of proof is 22. Level of proof is 15.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 1 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 0.17/0.44 2 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 0.17/0.44 3 [] {+} -cCar(A)|cAutomobile(A).
% 0.17/0.44 4 [] {+} cCar(A)| -cAutomobile(A).
% 0.17/0.44 5 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 6 [copy,5,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 7 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 8 [copy,7,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 9 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 10 [copy,9,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 11 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 12 [copy,11,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 13 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 14 [copy,13,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 15 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 16 [copy,15,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 17 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 18 [copy,17,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 19 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 20 [copy,19,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cCar($c3)| -cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 21 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 0.17/0.44 22 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 0.17/0.44 23 [hyper,22,14,21,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 24 [hyper,23,6,21,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.17/0.44 25 [hyper,24,2,23,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} cAutomobile($c3)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 26 [hyper,25,3] {+} cAutomobile($c3)|cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 28 [hyper,26,16,21,22,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} cAutomobile($c3)|xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.17/0.44 30 [hyper,28,8,21,26,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} cAutomobile($c3)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.17/0.44 31 [hyper,30,2,28,factor_simp] {+} cAutomobile($c3).
% 0.17/0.44 32 [hyper,31,4] {+} cCar($c3).
% 0.17/0.44 33 [hyper,32,18,21,22,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 35 [hyper,33,10,21,32,factor_simp] {+} cCar($c4)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.17/0.44 36 [hyper,35,2,33,factor_simp] {+} cCar($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 37 [hyper,36,3] {+} cAutomobile($c4).
% 0.17/0.44 38 [hyper,37,20,21,22,32,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.17/0.44 39 [hyper,38,12,21,32,37] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 0.17/0.44 40 [hyper,39,2,38] {-} $F.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.17/0.44 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 ============ end of search ============
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 true clauses given 14 (77.8%)
% 0.17/0.44 false clauses given 4
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 FALSE TRUE
% 0.17/0.44 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Model 5 [ 2 0 162 ] (0.00 seconds, 2541 Inserts)
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.17/0.44
% 0.17/0.44 Process 17872 finished Tue Jun 7 19:25:06 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------