TSTP Solution File: KRS158+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS158+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : KRS158+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 13:33:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 54 Number of unprocessed: 54
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36  # 54 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36  # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.36  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36  # 45 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.12/0.36  # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36  # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 5 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (cC2xcomp(iV16562))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (cC2xcomp(iV16561))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (cC10xcomp(iV16562))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (cTOP(iV16560))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (cC4xcomp(iV16561))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (cTEST(iV16560))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (rR1(iV16560,iV16562))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (rR1(iV16560,iV16561))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~xsd_integer(X1)|~xsd_string(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (~cC10xcomp(X1)|~ra_Px3(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (~ra_Px1(X1,X2)|~cC2(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~cC4xcomp(X1)|~ra_Px6(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (~cC6(iV16561)|~cC18(iV16560)|~cC8(iV16560)|~cC16(iV16560)|~cC14(iV16560)|~cC12(iV16562)|~xsd_integer(esk12_0))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (~cC6(iV16561)|~cC18(iV16560)|~cC8(iV16560)|~cC16(iV16560)|~cC14(iV16560)|~cC12(iV16562)|~xsd_string(esk12_0))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (cC14(X1)|~cC16(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (xsd_integer(X1)|xsd_string(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (cC16(X1)|~cC18(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (cC2xcomp(X1)|~cC12(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (cC2xcomp(X1)|~cC6(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (cC18(X1)|~cTEST(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (cTOP(X1)|~cTEST(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (cC8(X1)|~cC16(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (cC16(X1)|~cC8(X1)|~cC14(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (cC10xcomp(X1)|~cC12(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (cTOP(X1)|~cC18(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (cC4xcomp(X1)|~cC6(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (cC2xcomp(esk2_1(X1))|~cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (cC12(esk4_1(X1))|~cC14(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (cC10(X1)|~ra_Px3(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (cC2xcomp(X1)|~ra_Px1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (cC4(X1)|~ra_Px6(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (cC12(X1)|~cC10xcomp(X1)|~cC2xcomp(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (cC6(esk10_1(X1))|~cC8(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (cC18(X1)|~cTOP(X1)|~cC16(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (cC2(X1)|~rR1(iV16562,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (cC2(X1)|~rR1(iV16561,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (cC6(X1)|~cC4xcomp(X1)|~cC2xcomp(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (cC2xcomp(esk8_1(X1))|~cC4(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (cTEST(X1)|~cC18(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (cC10(X1)|~cC2xcomp(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (cC4(X1)|~cC2xcomp(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (cC14(X1)|~cC12(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (cC8(X1)|~cC6(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (rR1(X1,esk4_1(X1))|~cC14(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (rR1(X1,esk10_1(X1))|~cC8(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (ra_Px3(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (rR1(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (rR1(X1,esk8_1(X1))|~cC4(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (cC10xcomp(X1)|ra_Px3(X1,esk3_1(X1)))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ra_Px1(X1,esk5_1(X1))|cC2(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (ra_Px1(X1,esk6_1(X1))|~cC2xcomp(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (ra_Px6(X1,esk7_1(X1))|~cC4(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (cC4xcomp(X1)|ra_Px6(X1,esk9_1(X1)))).
% 0.12/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # Found 20 steps
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (~cC6(iV16561)|~cC18(iV16560)|~cC8(iV16560)|~cC16(iV16560)|~cC14(iV16560)|~cC12(iV16562)|~xsd_string(esk12_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (~cC14(iV16560)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_575, plain, (~rR1(iV16560,iV16562)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_47])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_574, plain, (~cC12(iV16562)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1089, plain, (~cC10xcomp(iV16562)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_55])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1090, plain, (~cC2xcomp(iV16562)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_56])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (~cC6(iV16561)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1144, plain, (~cC4xcomp(iV16561)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_51])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1145, plain, (~cC2xcomp(iV16561)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_52])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (~cC18(iV16560)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1165, plain, (~cTEST(iV16560)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (~cC8(iV16560)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1231, plain, (~rR1(iV16560,esk4_1(iV16560))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1512, plain, (~cC14(iV16560)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_63])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1230, plain, (~cC6(esk4_1(iV16560))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_35])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~cC16(iV16560)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_62, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~cC12(iV16562)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_64, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~xsd_string(esk12_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_65, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1612, plain, (~cC4xcomp(esk4_1(iV16560))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1612, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1613, plain, (~cC2xcomp(esk4_1(iV16560))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1613, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 5 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.39  # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.39  # Child (2770) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.39  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------