TSTP Solution File: KRS148+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.57s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 10 unt; 6 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 64 ( 0 equ; 37 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_214,plain,
( cC140(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_214) ).
cnf(i_0_215,plain,
cTEST(iV5475),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_215) ).
cnf(i_0_232,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk39_0)
| xsd_string(esk40_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk40_0)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cC140(iV5475) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_213,plain,
( cC116(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_213) ).
cnf(i_0_75,plain,
( cC138(X1)
| ~ cC140(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_75) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_233,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk39_0)
| xsd_integer(esk40_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk40_0)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cC140(iV5475) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_233) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-o2699zmk/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_243,plain,
( cC140(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
i_0_214 ).
cnf(c_0_244,plain,
cTEST(iV5475),
i_0_215 ).
cnf(c_0_245,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk39_0)
| xsd_string(esk40_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk40_0)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cC140(iV5475) ),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_246,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_247,plain,
( cC116(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
i_0_213 ).
cnf(c_0_248,plain,
( cC138(X1)
| ~ cC140(X1) ),
i_0_75 ).
cnf(c_0_249,plain,
cC140(iV5475),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_243,c_0_244]) ).
cnf(c_0_250,negated_conjecture,
( xsd_string(esk40_0)
| ~ cC140(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk40_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_245,c_0_246]) ).
cnf(c_0_251,plain,
cC116(iV5475),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_247,c_0_244]) ).
cnf(c_0_252,plain,
cC138(iV5475),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_248,c_0_249]) ).
cnf(c_0_253,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_254,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk39_0)
| xsd_integer(esk40_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk40_0)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cC140(iV5475) ),
i_0_233 ).
cnf(c_0_255,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_256,negated_conjecture,
xsd_string(esk40_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_250,c_0_251])]),c_0_249]),c_0_252])]),c_0_253]) ).
cnf(c_0_257,negated_conjecture,
( xsd_integer(esk40_0)
| ~ cC140(iV5475)
| ~ cC138(iV5475)
| ~ cC116(iV5475)
| ~ xsd_string(esk40_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_254,c_0_246]) ).
cnf(c_0_258,plain,
~ xsd_integer(esk40_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_255,c_0_256]) ).
cnf(c_0_259,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_257,c_0_251])]),c_0_249]),c_0_252]),c_0_256])]),c_0_258]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : KRS148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 05:34:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.57/2.40 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.57/2.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.57/2.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.57/2.40 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S064A
% 7.57/2.40 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 7.57/2.40 #
% 7.57/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 7.57/2.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.57/2.40
% 7.57/2.40 # Proof found!
% 7.57/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.57/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.57/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.57/2.40
% 7.57/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.57/2.40 # User time : 0.028 s
% 7.57/2.40 # System time : 0.008 s
% 7.57/2.40 # Total time : 0.037 s
% 7.57/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.57/2.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------