TSTP Solution File: KRS141+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KRS141+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:59:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 77 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 89 ( 38 ~; 34 |; 12 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 4 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& cc(io)
& cowlThing(io) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',the_axiom) ).
fof(axiom_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_0) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cr(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( rp(X1,X2)
=> cc(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_5,axiom,
rp(ii,io),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_5) ).
fof(axiom_3,axiom,
cr(ii),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_3) ).
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& cc(io)
& cowlThing(io) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[the_axiom]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ xsd_string(esk3_0)
| xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| ~ cc(io)
| ~ cowlThing(io) )
& ( xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| ~ cc(io)
| ~ cowlThing(io) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( cowlThing(X2)
& ~ cowlNothing(X2) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ cr(X3)
| ~ rp(X3,X4)
| cc(X4) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(io)
| ~ cc(io)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( cc(X1)
| ~ rp(X2,X1)
| ~ cr(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
rp(ii,io),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
cr(ii),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( ( ~ xsd_string(X2)
| ~ xsd_integer(X2) )
& ( xsd_integer(X2)
| xsd_string(X2) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ cc(io) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
cc(io),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(io)
| ~ cc(io)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
xsd_integer(esk3_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cc(io) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_11]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ xsd_string(esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),c_0_22])]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS141+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 13:38:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 26
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 18
% 0.25/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.25/1.42 # Processed clauses : 12
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Generated clauses : 5
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.25/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 539
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2768 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------