TSTP Solution File: KRS140+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : KRS140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : KRS140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 15:15:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS derived 90 clauses, backtracked 48 clauses, performed 7 splits and kept 96 clauses.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS allocated 97939 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  
% 0.19/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 76 :
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> cowlThing(u)*.
% 0.19/0.44  4[0:Inp] ||  -> rsymProp(skc8,skc9)*.
% 0.19/0.44  5[0:Inp] cowlNothing(u) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  6[0:Inp] ||  -> rsymProp(ia,ia)*.
% 0.19/0.44  7[0:Inp] ||  -> rsymProp(ib,ib)*.
% 0.19/0.44  8[0:Inp] ||  -> xsd_string(u)* xsd_integer(u).
% 0.19/0.44  9[0:Inp] || xsd_integer(skc11) -> xsd_string(skc11)* SkC0.
% 0.19/0.44  10[0:Inp] || xsd_string(skc11)* -> xsd_integer(skc11) SkC0.
% 0.19/0.44  11[0:Inp] xsd_integer(u) xsd_string(u) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  12[0:Inp] || rsymProp(u,v)*+ -> rsymProp(v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.44  13[0:Inp] || rsymProp(u,v)*+ -> equal(v,ia) equal(v,ib).
% 0.19/0.44  14[0:Inp] cowlThing(u) || SkC0 rsymProp(ia,u)* cowlThing(skc6) -> rsymProp(skc10,skc8)* cowlNothing(skc7).
% 0.19/0.44  15[0:Inp] cowlThing(u) || cowlThing(skc6) SkC0 rsymProp(ia,u)* rsymProp(skc10,skc9)* -> cowlNothing(skc7).
% 0.19/0.44  16[0:MRR:10.0,8.1] ||  -> SkC0 xsd_integer(skc11)*.
% 0.19/0.44  17[0:MRR:9.0,16.0] ||  -> SkC0 xsd_string(skc11)*.
% 0.19/0.44  18[0:MRR:14.0,14.3,14.5,1.0,1.0,5.0] || SkC0 rsymProp(ia,u)* -> rsymProp(skc10,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  19[0:MRR:15.0,15.1,15.5,1.0,1.0,5.0] || SkC0 rsymProp(ia,u)* rsymProp(skc10,skc9)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  20[0:Res:4.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(skc9,ia) equal(skc9,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  21[0:Res:4.0,12.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc9,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  22[0:Res:6.0,18.1] || SkC0 -> rsymProp(skc10,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  23[0:Res:6.0,19.1] || SkC0 rsymProp(skc10,skc9)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  24[1:Spt:20.0] ||  -> equal(skc9,ia)**.
% 0.19/0.44  25[1:Rew:24.0,21.0] ||  -> rsymProp(ia,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  26[1:Rew:24.0,4.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc8,ia)*.
% 0.19/0.44  27[1:Rew:24.0,23.1] || SkC0 rsymProp(skc10,ia)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  29[2:Spt:16.0] ||  -> SkC0*.
% 0.19/0.44  30[2:MRR:22.0,29.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc10,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  31[2:MRR:27.0,29.0] || rsymProp(skc10,ia)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  36[2:Res:30.0,12.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc8,skc10)*.
% 0.19/0.44  40[1:Res:25.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(skc8,ia) equal(skc8,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  42[2:Res:36.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(skc10,ia) equal(skc10,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  44[3:Spt:40.0] ||  -> equal(skc8,ia)**.
% 0.19/0.44  47[3:Rew:44.0,30.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc10,ia)*.
% 0.19/0.44  49[3:MRR:47.0,31.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  50[3:Spt:49.0,40.0,44.0] || equal(skc8,ia)** -> .
% 0.19/0.44  51[3:Spt:49.0,40.1] ||  -> equal(skc8,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  54[3:Rew:51.0,26.0] ||  -> rsymProp(ib,ia)*.
% 0.19/0.44  66[4:Spt:42.0] ||  -> equal(skc10,ia)**.
% 0.19/0.44  67[4:Rew:66.0,31.0] || rsymProp(ia,ia)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  70[4:MRR:67.0,6.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  71[4:Spt:70.0,42.0,66.0] || equal(skc10,ia)** -> .
% 0.19/0.44  72[4:Spt:70.0,42.1] ||  -> equal(skc10,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  75[4:Rew:72.0,31.0] || rsymProp(ib,ia)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  76[4:MRR:75.0,54.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  78[2:Spt:76.0,16.0,29.0] || SkC0*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.44  79[2:Spt:76.0,16.1] ||  -> xsd_integer(skc11)*.
% 0.19/0.44  80[2:MRR:17.0,78.0] ||  -> xsd_string(skc11)*.
% 0.19/0.44  82[2:EmS:11.0,11.1,79.0,80.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  83[1:Spt:82.0,20.0,24.0] || equal(skc9,ia)** -> .
% 0.19/0.44  84[1:Spt:82.0,20.1] ||  -> equal(skc9,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  85[1:Rew:84.0,4.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc8,ib)*.
% 0.19/0.44  86[1:Rew:84.0,21.0] ||  -> rsymProp(ib,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  88[1:Rew:84.0,23.1] || SkC0 rsymProp(skc10,ib)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  90[2:Spt:17.0] ||  -> SkC0*.
% 0.19/0.44  91[2:MRR:22.0,90.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc10,skc8)*.
% 0.19/0.44  92[2:MRR:88.0,90.0] || rsymProp(skc10,ib)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  95[1:Res:86.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(skc8,ia) equal(skc8,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  98[2:Res:91.0,12.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc8,skc10)*.
% 0.19/0.44  99[2:Res:98.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(skc10,ia) equal(skc10,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  101[3:Spt:95.0] ||  -> equal(skc8,ia)**.
% 0.19/0.44  102[3:Rew:101.0,85.0] ||  -> rsymProp(ia,ib)*.
% 0.19/0.44  115[4:Spt:99.0] ||  -> equal(skc10,ia)**.
% 0.19/0.44  116[4:Rew:115.0,92.0] || rsymProp(ia,ib)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  119[4:MRR:116.0,102.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  120[4:Spt:119.0,99.0,115.0] || equal(skc10,ia)** -> .
% 0.19/0.44  121[4:Spt:119.0,99.1] ||  -> equal(skc10,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  124[4:Rew:121.0,92.0] || rsymProp(ib,ib)* -> .
% 0.19/0.44  125[4:MRR:124.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  127[3:Spt:125.0,95.0,101.0] || equal(skc8,ia)** -> .
% 0.19/0.44  128[3:Spt:125.0,95.1] ||  -> equal(skc8,ib)**.
% 0.19/0.44  130[3:Rew:128.0,91.0] ||  -> rsymProp(skc10,ib)*.
% 0.19/0.44  133[3:MRR:92.0,130.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  135[2:Spt:133.0,17.0,90.0] || SkC0*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.44  136[2:Spt:133.0,17.1] ||  -> xsd_string(skc11)*.
% 0.19/0.44  137[2:MRR:16.0,135.0] ||  -> xsd_integer(skc11)*.
% 0.19/0.44  138[2:EmS:11.0,11.1,137.0,136.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : axiom_0 the_axiom axiom_7 axiom_3 axiom_5 axiom_1 axiom_2
% 0.19/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------