TSTP Solution File: KRS134+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 11:39:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Tue Jun  7 11:39:32 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 12806.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  16 back subsumes 11.
% 0.12/0.35  16 back subsumes 5.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 0.12/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 77
% 0.12/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.12/0.38     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.12/0.38     distinct function count: 0
% 0.12/0.38     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.37/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Model 3 [ 1 0 123 ] (0.00 seconds, 81088 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Model 4 [ 1 1 105 ] (0.00 seconds, 66156 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Model 5 [ 1 0 131 ] (0.00 seconds, 53261 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Model 6 [ 2 0 60 ] (0.00 seconds, 69759 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.23 sec ----> 24 [hyper,23,2,22] {-} $F.
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Length of proof is 10.  Level of proof is 7.
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.37/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  1 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 0.37/0.60  2 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 0.37/0.60  3 [] {+} -rprop(A,B)|cA(B).
% 0.37/0.60  6 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rprop($c4,$c3).
% 0.37/0.60  7 [copy,6,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rprop($c4,$c3).
% 0.37/0.60  8 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cA($c3).
% 0.37/0.60  9 [copy,8,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cA($c3).
% 0.37/0.60  12 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rprop($c4,$c3).
% 0.37/0.60  13 [copy,12,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rprop($c4,$c3).
% 0.37/0.60  14 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cA($c3).
% 0.37/0.60  15 [copy,14,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cA($c3).
% 0.37/0.60  16 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 0.37/0.60  17 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 0.37/0.60  18 [hyper,17,13,16,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|rprop($c4,$c3).
% 0.37/0.60  19 [hyper,18,7,16,factor_simp] {-} rprop($c4,$c3)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.37/0.60  20 [hyper,19,2,18,factor_simp] {+} rprop($c4,$c3).
% 0.37/0.60  21 [hyper,20,3] {+} cA($c3).
% 0.37/0.60  22 [hyper,21,15,16,17,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.37/0.60  23 [hyper,22,9,16,21] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 0.37/0.60  24 [hyper,23,2,22] {-} $F.
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.60  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  ============ end of search ============
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  true clauses given           2      (25.0%)
% 0.37/0.60  false clauses given          6
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.37/0.60  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Model 6 [ 2 0 60 ] (0.00 seconds, 69759 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.37/0.60  
% 0.37/0.60  Process 12806 finished Tue Jun  7 11:39:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------