TSTP Solution File: KRS129+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : KRS129+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:51:21 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.83s 1.67s
% Output   : Proof 8.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KRS129+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:56:47 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.59  ________       _____
% 0.18/0.59  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.18/0.59  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.18/0.59  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.18/0.59  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.18/0.59  (2023-06-19)
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.18/0.59  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.18/0.59                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.18/0.59  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.18/0.59  
% 0.18/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.61/1.05  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.05  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.09  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.09  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.09  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.09  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.61/1.09  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.07/1.34  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.77/1.34  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.77/1.39  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.77/1.40  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.77/1.42  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.77/1.46  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.77/1.49  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 6.52/1.64  Prover 3: gave up
% 6.83/1.64  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.83/1.66  Prover 0: proved (1044ms)
% 6.83/1.67  
% 6.83/1.67  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.83/1.67  
% 6.83/1.68  Prover 6: stopped
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 5: stopped
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 2: stopped
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.83/1.69  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 6.83/1.70  Prover 1: gave up
% 6.83/1.71  Prover 4: Found proof (size 49)
% 6.83/1.71  Prover 4: proved (1088ms)
% 6.83/1.71  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 6.83/1.73  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.83/1.73  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.83/1.74  Prover 10: stopped
% 7.50/1.74  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.50/1.74  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.50/1.75  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 7.50/1.76  Prover 13: stopped
% 7.50/1.76  Prover 16: stopped
% 7.50/1.77  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.50/1.77  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.50/1.78  Prover 7: stopped
% 7.50/1.78  Prover 11: stopped
% 7.86/1.82  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.86/1.82  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.86/1.83  Prover 8: stopped
% 7.86/1.83  
% 7.86/1.83  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.86/1.83  
% 7.86/1.84  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 7.86/1.84  Assumptions after simplification:
% 7.86/1.84  ---------------------------------
% 7.86/1.84  
% 7.86/1.84    (axiom_0)
% 8.18/1.87     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0)) & 
% 8.18/1.87    ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cowlNothing(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 8.18/1.87  
% 8.18/1.87    (axiom_1)
% 8.18/1.87     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 8.18/1.87      xsd_integer(v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 8.18/1.87      (xsd_integer(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | xsd_string(v0) = 0) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 8.18/1.87      (xsd_string(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 8.18/1.87        xsd_integer(v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (xsd_integer(v0) = 0) |  ~
% 8.18/1.87      $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & xsd_string(v0) = v1))
% 8.18/1.87  
% 8.18/1.87    (axiom_13)
% 8.18/1.87    rhasEuroMP(iUK, iKinnock) = 0 & $i(iKinnock) & $i(iUK)
% 8.18/1.87  
% 8.18/1.87    (axiom_3)
% 8.18/1.88     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (risEuroMPFrom(v0, v2)
% 8.18/1.88        = 0) |  ~ (cEuroMP(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~
% 8.18/1.88        (v3 = 0) & cowlThing(v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 8.18/1.88    : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v2) = 0) |  ~ (cEuroMP(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 8.18/1.88      $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & risEuroMPFrom(v0, v2) = v3)) &  !
% 8.18/1.88    [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cEuroMP(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :
% 8.18/1.88      (risEuroMPFrom(v0, v1) = 0 & cowlThing(v1) = 0 & $i(v1)))
% 8.18/1.88  
% 8.18/1.88    (axiom_5)
% 8.18/1.88     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (risEuroMPFrom(v0, v1)
% 8.18/1.88        = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 8.18/1.88        rhasEuroMP(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2
% 8.18/1.88      = 0 |  ~ (rhasEuroMP(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] :
% 8.18/1.88      ( ~ (v3 = 0) & risEuroMPFrom(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : (
% 8.18/1.88      ~ (risEuroMPFrom(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | rhasEuroMP(v1, v0) =
% 8.18/1.88      0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (rhasEuroMP(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) | 
% 8.18/1.88      ~ $i(v0) | risEuroMPFrom(v0, v1) = 0)
% 8.18/1.88  
% 8.18/1.88    (the_axiom)
% 8.18/1.88    $i(iKinnock) &  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] :  ?
% 8.18/1.88    [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : (cEuroMP(iKinnock) = v0 & $i(v4) &
% 8.18/1.88      $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (xsd_string(v1) = v2 & xsd_integer(v1) = v3 & ((v3 =
% 8.18/1.88              0 & v2 = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &  ~ (v2 = 0)))) | (cowlThing(v4) = v5 &
% 8.18/1.88          cowlNothing(v4) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))
% 8.18/1.88  
% 8.18/1.88    (function-axioms)
% 8.18/1.89     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 8.18/1.89    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (risEuroMPFrom(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (risEuroMPFrom(v3,
% 8.18/1.89          v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : 
% 8.18/1.89    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rhasEuroMP(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (rhasEuroMP(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (xsd_string(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (xsd_integer(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (cowlThing(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cowlNothing(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (cowlNothing(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cPerson(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (cPerson(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cEuropeanCountry(v2) = v1)
% 8.18/1.89      |  ~ (cEuropeanCountry(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cEuroMP(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (cEuroMP(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 8.18/1.89      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (cEUCountry(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89      (cEUCountry(v2) = v0))
% 8.18/1.89  
% 8.18/1.89  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 8.18/1.89  --------------------------------------------
% 8.18/1.89  axiom_10, axiom_11, axiom_12, axiom_2, axiom_4, axiom_6, axiom_7, axiom_8,
% 8.18/1.89  axiom_9, cEUCountry_substitution_1, cEuroMP_substitution_1,
% 8.18/1.89  cEuropeanCountry_substitution_1, cPerson_substitution_1,
% 8.18/1.89  cowlNothing_substitution_1, cowlThing_substitution_1, rhasEuroMP_substitution_1,
% 8.18/1.89  rhasEuroMP_substitution_2, risEuroMPFrom_substitution_1,
% 8.18/1.89  risEuroMPFrom_substitution_2, xsd_integer_substitution_1,
% 8.18/1.89  xsd_string_substitution_1
% 8.18/1.89  
% 8.18/1.89  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 8.18/1.89  ---------------------------------
% 8.18/1.89  
% 8.18/1.89  Begin of proof
% 8.18/1.89  | 
% 8.18/1.89  | ALPHA: (axiom_0) implies:
% 8.18/1.89  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cowlNothing(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 8.18/1.89  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (cowlThing(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.89  |          $i(v0))
% 8.18/1.89  | 
% 8.18/1.89  | ALPHA: (axiom_1) implies:
% 8.18/1.89  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (xsd_string(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: int] : ( ~
% 8.18/1.89  |            (v1 = 0) & xsd_integer(v0) = v1))
% 8.18/1.90  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (xsd_integer(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 8.18/1.90  |          $i(v0) | xsd_string(v0) = 0)
% 8.18/1.90  | 
% 8.18/1.90  | ALPHA: (axiom_3) implies:
% 8.18/1.90  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 8.18/1.90  |          (risEuroMPFrom(v0, v2) = 0) |  ~ (cEuroMP(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 8.18/1.90  |          $i(v0) |  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & cowlThing(v2) = v3))
% 8.18/1.90  | 
% 8.18/1.90  | ALPHA: (axiom_5) implies:
% 8.18/1.90  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (rhasEuroMP(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) | 
% 8.18/1.90  |          ~ $i(v0) | risEuroMPFrom(v0, v1) = 0)
% 8.18/1.90  | 
% 8.18/1.90  | ALPHA: (axiom_13) implies:
% 8.18/1.90  |   (7)  $i(iUK)
% 8.18/1.90  |   (8)  rhasEuroMP(iUK, iKinnock) = 0
% 8.18/1.90  | 
% 8.18/1.90  | ALPHA: (the_axiom) implies:
% 8.18/1.90  |   (9)  $i(iKinnock)
% 8.18/1.90  |   (10)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: $i]
% 8.18/1.90  |         :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : (cEuroMP(iKinnock) = v0 & $i(v4) &
% 8.18/1.90  |           $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (xsd_string(v1) = v2 & xsd_integer(v1) = v3
% 8.18/1.90  |               & ((v3 = 0 & v2 = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &  ~ (v2 = 0)))) |
% 8.18/1.90  |             (cowlThing(v4) = v5 & cowlNothing(v4) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 =
% 8.18/1.90  |                 0))))
% 8.18/1.90  | 
% 8.18/1.90  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 8.40/1.90  |   (11)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 8.40/1.90  |         : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v1) |  ~ (xsd_integer(v2) = v0))
% 8.40/1.90  |   (12)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i]
% 8.40/1.90  |         : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v1) |  ~ (xsd_string(v2) = v0))
% 8.40/1.90  | 
% 8.40/1.90  | DELTA: instantiating (10) with fresh symbols all_10_0, all_10_1, all_10_2,
% 8.40/1.90  |        all_10_3, all_10_4, all_10_5, all_10_6 gives:
% 8.40/1.90  |   (13)  cEuroMP(iKinnock) = all_10_6 & $i(all_10_2) & $i(all_10_5) & ( ~
% 8.40/1.90  |           (all_10_6 = 0) | (xsd_string(all_10_5) = all_10_4 &
% 8.40/1.90  |             xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_10_3 & ((all_10_3 = 0 & all_10_4 = 0)
% 8.40/1.90  |               | ( ~ (all_10_3 = 0) &  ~ (all_10_4 = 0)))) |
% 8.40/1.90  |           (cowlThing(all_10_2) = all_10_1 & cowlNothing(all_10_2) = all_10_0 &
% 8.40/1.90  |             ( ~ (all_10_1 = 0) | all_10_0 = 0)))
% 8.40/1.90  | 
% 8.40/1.90  | ALPHA: (13) implies:
% 8.40/1.90  |   (14)  $i(all_10_5)
% 8.40/1.90  |   (15)  $i(all_10_2)
% 8.40/1.90  |   (16)  cEuroMP(iKinnock) = all_10_6
% 8.40/1.90  |   (17)   ~ (all_10_6 = 0) | (xsd_string(all_10_5) = all_10_4 &
% 8.40/1.90  |           xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_10_3 & ((all_10_3 = 0 & all_10_4 = 0) |
% 8.40/1.90  |             ( ~ (all_10_3 = 0) &  ~ (all_10_4 = 0)))) | (cowlThing(all_10_2) =
% 8.40/1.90  |           all_10_1 & cowlNothing(all_10_2) = all_10_0 & ( ~ (all_10_1 = 0) |
% 8.40/1.90  |             all_10_0 = 0))
% 8.40/1.90  | 
% 8.40/1.91  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with iKinnock, iUK, simplifying with (7), (8),
% 8.40/1.91  |              (9) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  |   (18)  risEuroMPFrom(iKinnock, iUK) = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | 
% 8.40/1.91  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with iKinnock, all_10_6, iUK, simplifying with
% 8.40/1.91  |              (7), (9), (16), (18) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  |   (19)  all_10_6 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & cowlThing(iUK) = v0)
% 8.40/1.91  | 
% 8.40/1.91  | BETA: splitting (17) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | 
% 8.40/1.91  | Case 1:
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | |   (20)   ~ (all_10_6 = 0)
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | BETA: splitting (19) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | Case 1:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (21)  all_10_6 = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | REDUCE: (20), (21) imply:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (22)  $false
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | Case 2:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (23)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & cowlThing(iUK) = v0)
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | DELTA: instantiating (23) with fresh symbol all_29_0 gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (24)   ~ (all_29_0 = 0) & cowlThing(iUK) = all_29_0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (25)   ~ (all_29_0 = 0)
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (26)  cowlThing(iUK) = all_29_0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with iUK, all_29_0, simplifying with (7),
% 8.40/1.91  | | |              (26) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (27)  all_29_0 = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | REDUCE: (25), (27) imply:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (28)  $false
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | End of split
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | Case 2:
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | |   (29)  (xsd_string(all_10_5) = all_10_4 & xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_10_3
% 8.40/1.91  | |           & ((all_10_3 = 0 & all_10_4 = 0) | ( ~ (all_10_3 = 0) &  ~
% 8.40/1.91  | |               (all_10_4 = 0)))) | (cowlThing(all_10_2) = all_10_1 &
% 8.40/1.91  | |           cowlNothing(all_10_2) = all_10_0 & ( ~ (all_10_1 = 0) | all_10_0 =
% 8.40/1.91  | |             0))
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | BETA: splitting (29) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | Case 1:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (30)  xsd_string(all_10_5) = all_10_4 & xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_10_3
% 8.40/1.91  | | |         & ((all_10_3 = 0 & all_10_4 = 0) | ( ~ (all_10_3 = 0) &  ~
% 8.40/1.91  | | |             (all_10_4 = 0)))
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (31)  xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_10_3
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (32)  xsd_string(all_10_5) = all_10_4
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (33)  (all_10_3 = 0 & all_10_4 = 0) | ( ~ (all_10_3 = 0) &  ~ (all_10_4
% 8.40/1.91  | | |             = 0))
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_10_5, all_10_3, simplifying with
% 8.40/1.91  | | |              (14), (31) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | | |   (34)  all_10_3 = 0 | xsd_string(all_10_5) = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | Case 1:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | |   (35)  all_10_3 = 0 & all_10_4 = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | ALPHA: (35) implies:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | |   (36)  all_10_4 = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | |   (37)  all_10_3 = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | REDUCE: (32), (36) imply:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | |   (38)  xsd_string(all_10_5) = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | REDUCE: (31), (37) imply:
% 8.40/1.91  | | | |   (39)  xsd_integer(all_10_5) = 0
% 8.40/1.91  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_10_5, simplifying with (14),
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |              (38) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (40)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & xsd_integer(all_10_5) = v0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (40) with fresh symbol all_63_0 gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (41)   ~ (all_63_0 = 0) & xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_63_0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | ALPHA: (41) implies:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (42)   ~ (all_63_0 = 0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (43)  xsd_integer(all_10_5) = all_63_0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with 0, all_63_0, all_10_5, simplifying
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |              with (39), (43) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (44)  all_63_0 = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | REDUCE: (42), (44) imply:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (45)  $false
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | CLOSE: (45) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | Case 2:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (46)   ~ (all_10_3 = 0) &  ~ (all_10_4 = 0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | ALPHA: (46) implies:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (47)   ~ (all_10_4 = 0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (48)   ~ (all_10_3 = 0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | BETA: splitting (34) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | Case 1:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | |   (49)  xsd_string(all_10_5) = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (12) with all_10_4, 0, all_10_5,
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | |              simplifying with (32), (49) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | |   (50)  all_10_4 = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | REDUCE: (47), (50) imply:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | |   (51)  $false
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | CLOSE: (51) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | Case 2:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | |   (52)  all_10_3 = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | REDUCE: (48), (52) imply:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | |   (53)  $false
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | End of split
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | End of split
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | Case 2:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | |   (54)  cowlThing(all_10_2) = all_10_1 & cowlNothing(all_10_2) = all_10_0
% 8.40/1.92  | | |         & ( ~ (all_10_1 = 0) | all_10_0 = 0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | ALPHA: (54) implies:
% 8.40/1.92  | | |   (55)  cowlNothing(all_10_2) = all_10_0
% 8.40/1.92  | | |   (56)  cowlThing(all_10_2) = all_10_1
% 8.40/1.92  | | |   (57)   ~ (all_10_1 = 0) | all_10_0 = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_10_2, all_10_1, simplifying with
% 8.40/1.92  | | |              (15), (56) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | |   (58)  all_10_1 = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | BETA: splitting (57) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | Case 1:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (59)   ~ (all_10_1 = 0)
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | REDUCE: (58), (59) imply:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (60)  $false
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | CLOSE: (60) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | Case 2:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (61)  all_10_0 = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | REDUCE: (55), (61) imply:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (62)  cowlNothing(all_10_2) = 0
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_10_2, simplifying with (15),
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |              (62) gives:
% 8.40/1.92  | | | |   (63)  $false
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | CLOSE: (63) is inconsistent.
% 8.40/1.92  | | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | | End of split
% 8.40/1.92  | | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | | End of split
% 8.40/1.92  | | 
% 8.40/1.92  | End of split
% 8.40/1.92  | 
% 8.40/1.92  End of proof
% 8.40/1.92  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 8.40/1.92  
% 8.40/1.92  1329ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------