TSTP Solution File: KRS128+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : KRS128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_31584),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
cexcomp(skf9(u)),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(17,axiom,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| rr(u,skf9(u)) ),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(22,axiom,
( ~ ca_Cx4(u)
| ra_Px4(u,skf16(u)) ),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(23,axiom,
( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(u)
| ~ ra_Px4(u,v) ),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(24,axiom,
( ~ cexcomp(u)
| ~ cd(u)
| ca_Cx4xcomp(u) ),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(25,axiom,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ rr(u,v)
| cd(v) ),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(26,axiom,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ rr(u,v)
| ca_Cx4(v) ),
file('KRS128+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(62,plain,
( ~ ca_Cx4(u)
| ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,23]),
[iquote('0:Res:22.1,23.1')] ).
cnf(65,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ca_Cx4(skf9(u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,26]),
[iquote('0:Res:17.1,26.1')] ).
cnf(66,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ca_Cx4(skf9(u)) ),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[65]),
[iquote('0:Obv:65.0')] ).
cnf(67,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ cd(skf9(u))
| ~ cexcomp(skf9(u)) ),
inference(ems,[status(thm)],[62,66,24]),
[iquote('0:EmS:62.0,62.1,66.1,24.2')] ).
cnf(68,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ cd(skf9(u)) ),
inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[67,4,66]),
[iquote('0:SSi:67.2,4.1,66.0')] ).
cnf(69,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| cd(skf9(u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,25]),
[iquote('0:Res:17.1,25.1')] ).
cnf(70,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| cd(skf9(u)) ),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[69]),
[iquote('0:Obv:69.0')] ).
cnf(71,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(u),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[70,68]),
[iquote('0:MRR:70.1,68.1')] ).
cnf(72,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[71,2]),
[iquote('0:UnC:71.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 13:42:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS derived 20 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 39 clauses.
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS allocated 97846 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 17 :
% 0.19/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46 Formulae used in the proof : axiom_11 axiom_2 axiom_10 axiom_8 axiom_9
% 0.19/0.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------