TSTP Solution File: KRS128+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.34s 2.08s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   46 (   0 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px4(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ( ra_Px4(X1,esk8_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Cx4(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( cd(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ cexcomp(X1)
    | ~ cd(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( cexcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_31584),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_oasplb8/input.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px4(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ra_Px4(X1,esk8_1(X1))
    | ~ ca_Cx4(X1) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4(X1)
    | ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( cd(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ ca_Cx4xcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ca_Cx4xcomp(X1)
    | ~ cexcomp(X1)
    | ~ cd(X1) ),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( cexcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( cd(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_31584),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : KRS128+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 13:31:37 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.34/2.08  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.34/2.08  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.34/2.08  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.34/2.08  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0003_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 4.34/2.08  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.34/2.08  #
% 4.34/2.08  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 4.34/2.08  
% 4.34/2.08  # Proof found!
% 4.34/2.08  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.34/2.08  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.34/2.08  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.34/2.08  
% 4.34/2.08  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.34/2.08  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 4.34/2.08  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 4.34/2.08  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 4.34/2.08  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.34/2.08  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------