TSTP Solution File: KRS126+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : KRS126+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 13:01:20 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 69 ( 31 ~; 26 |; 8 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 2 sgn 24 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_23554),
file('/tmp/tmp2KOgkM/sel_KRS126+1.p_1',axiom_11) ).
fof(3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
=> cd1xcomp(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmp2KOgkM/sel_KRS126+1.p_1',axiom_2) ).
fof(4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
=> cd1(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmp2KOgkM/sel_KRS126+1.p_1',axiom_3) ).
fof(8,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cd1(X1)
<=> ? [X2] : ra_Px2(X1,X2) ),
file('/tmp/tmp2KOgkM/sel_KRS126+1.p_1',axiom_7) ).
fof(11,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cd1xcomp(X1)
<=> ~ ? [X3] : ra_Px2(X1,X3) ),
file('/tmp/tmp2KOgkM/sel_KRS126+1.p_1',axiom_8) ).
cnf(18,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_23554),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(19,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| cd1xcomp(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
fof(20,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| cd1xcomp(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
( cd1xcomp(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(22,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| cd1(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
fof(23,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| cd1(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
( cd1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
fof(38,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ cd1(X1)
| ? [X2] : ra_Px2(X1,X2) )
& ( ! [X2] : ~ ra_Px2(X1,X2)
| cd1(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(39,plain,
! [X3] :
( ( ~ cd1(X3)
| ? [X4] : ra_Px2(X3,X4) )
& ( ! [X5] : ~ ra_Px2(X3,X5)
| cd1(X3) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[38]) ).
fof(40,plain,
! [X3] :
( ( ~ cd1(X3)
| ra_Px2(X3,esk2_1(X3)) )
& ( ! [X5] : ~ ra_Px2(X3,X5)
| cd1(X3) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[39]) ).
fof(41,plain,
! [X3,X5] :
( ( ~ ra_Px2(X3,X5)
| cd1(X3) )
& ( ~ cd1(X3)
| ra_Px2(X3,esk2_1(X3)) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[40]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
( ra_Px2(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cd1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).
fof(53,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ cd1xcomp(X1)
| ! [X3] : ~ ra_Px2(X1,X3) )
& ( ? [X3] : ra_Px2(X1,X3)
| cd1xcomp(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
fof(54,plain,
! [X4] :
( ( ~ cd1xcomp(X4)
| ! [X5] : ~ ra_Px2(X4,X5) )
& ( ? [X6] : ra_Px2(X4,X6)
| cd1xcomp(X4) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[53]) ).
fof(55,plain,
! [X4] :
( ( ~ cd1xcomp(X4)
| ! [X5] : ~ ra_Px2(X4,X5) )
& ( ra_Px2(X4,esk4_1(X4))
| cd1xcomp(X4) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[54]) ).
fof(56,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ ra_Px2(X4,X5)
| ~ cd1xcomp(X4) )
& ( ra_Px2(X4,esk4_1(X4))
| cd1xcomp(X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[55]) ).
cnf(58,plain,
( ~ cd1xcomp(X1)
| ~ ra_Px2(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56]) ).
cnf(70,plain,
( ~ cd1xcomp(X1)
| ~ cd1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[58,42,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(72,plain,
( ~ cd1xcomp(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[70,24,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(73,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[72,21]) ).
cnf(74,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[18,73,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(75,plain,
$false,
74,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KRS/KRS126+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmp2KOgkM/sel_KRS126+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Unsatisfiable
% Problem KRS126+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KRS/KRS126+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KRS/KRS126+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------