TSTP Solution File: KRS124+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : KRS124+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:51:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.85s 1.54s
% Output : Proof 6.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS124+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:26:32 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.59 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.59 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.59 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.59 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.59 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.59 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.59 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.59 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.59 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.72/0.99 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.72/0.99 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.34/1.04 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.34/1.04 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.34/1.05 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.34/1.05 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.34/1.05 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.23/1.32 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.23/1.33 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.23/1.36 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.23/1.37 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.23/1.38 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.85/1.39 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.85/1.47 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 4.85/1.53 Prover 1: gave up
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 5: proved (907ms)
% 4.85/1.54
% 4.85/1.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.85/1.54
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 3: stopped
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 6: stopped
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 2: stopped
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 0: stopped
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 4.85/1.54 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 4.85/1.55 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 5.48/1.55 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 6.01/1.57 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 6.01/1.58 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 6.01/1.58 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.01/1.59 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 6.01/1.60 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 6.01/1.60 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 6.28/1.61 Prover 4: Found proof (size 18)
% 6.28/1.61 Prover 4: proved (985ms)
% 6.28/1.62 Prover 13: stopped
% 6.28/1.62 Prover 16: stopped
% 6.28/1.63 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.47/1.63 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.47/1.64 Prover 11: stopped
% 6.47/1.64 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.47/1.64 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.47/1.64 Prover 7: stopped
% 6.47/1.65 Prover 10: stopped
% 6.47/1.66 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.47/1.67 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.47/1.67 Prover 8: stopped
% 6.47/1.67
% 6.47/1.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.47/1.67
% 6.47/1.68 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.47/1.68 Assumptions after simplification:
% 6.47/1.68 ---------------------------------
% 6.47/1.68
% 6.47/1.68 (axiom_12)
% 6.47/1.71 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (ca_Ax3(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 6.47/1.71 [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : (cd(v0) = v2 & cc(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | ~
% 6.47/1.71 (v2 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (cd(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0)
% 6.47/1.71 | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : (cc(v0) = v3 & ca_Ax3(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 =
% 6.47/1.71 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (cc(v0) =
% 6.47/1.71 v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : (cd(v0) = v3 & ca_Ax3(v0)
% 6.47/1.71 = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cd(v0) =
% 6.47/1.71 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : (cc(v0) = v1 & ca_Ax3(v0) =
% 6.47/1.71 v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cc(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0)
% 6.47/1.71 | ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : (cd(v0) = v1 & ca_Ax3(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 =
% 6.47/1.71 0) | v2 = 0))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (ca_Ax3(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 6.47/1.71 (cd(v0) = 0 & cc(v0) = 0))
% 6.47/1.71
% 6.47/1.71 (axiom_13)
% 6.47/1.72 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903) = 0 & $i(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903)
% 6.47/1.72
% 6.47/1.72 (axiom_2)
% 6.47/1.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) =
% 6.47/1.72 0) | ~ (ca_Ax3(v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3
% 6.47/1.72 = 0) & rr(v0, v1) = v3)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 6.47/1.72 (v1 = 0 | ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) = v1) | ~ (rr(v0, v2) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~
% 6.47/1.72 $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ($i(v3)
% 6.47/1.72 & ((v4 = 0 & ~ (v5 = 0) & ca_Ax3(v3) = v5 & rr(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 =
% 6.47/1.72 0) & cowlThing(v2) = v6)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : ! [v2:
% 6.47/1.72 $i] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) = v1) | ~ (cowlThing(v2) = 0) | ~
% 6.47/1.72 $i(v2) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6:
% 6.47/1.72 int] : ($i(v3) & ((v4 = 0 & ~ (v5 = 0) & ca_Ax3(v3) = v5 & rr(v0, v3) =
% 6.47/1.72 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & rr(v0, v2) = v6)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 6.47/1.72 ( ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) = 0) | ~ (rr(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 6.47/1.72 ca_Ax3(v1) = 0) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 6.47/1.72 ? [v1: $i] : (rr(v0, v1) = 0 & cowlThing(v1) = 0 & $i(v1)))
% 6.47/1.72
% 6.47/1.72 (axiom_3)
% 6.47/1.72 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (cdxcomp(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 6.47/1.72 [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & cc(v0) = v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cc(v0) = 0) |
% 6.47/1.72 ~ $i(v0) | cdxcomp(v0) = 0)
% 6.47/1.72
% 6.47/1.72 (axiom_6)
% 6.47/1.73 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (cd(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2:
% 6.47/1.73 $i] : (ra_Px1(v0, v2) = 0 & $i(v2))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 6.47/1.73 (cd(v0) = 0) | ~ (ra_Px1(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 6.47/1.73
% 6.47/1.73 (axiom_7)
% 6.97/1.73 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (ra_Px1(v0, v2) = 0) |
% 6.97/1.73 ~ (cdxcomp(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 6.97/1.73 (cdxcomp(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: $i] : (ra_Px1(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v1)))
% 6.97/1.73
% 6.97/1.73 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 6.97/1.73 --------------------------------------------
% 6.97/1.73 axiom_0, axiom_1, axiom_10, axiom_11, axiom_4, axiom_5, axiom_8, axiom_9
% 6.97/1.73
% 6.97/1.73 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 6.97/1.73 ---------------------------------
% 6.97/1.73
% 6.97/1.73 Begin of proof
% 6.97/1.73 |
% 6.97/1.73 | ALPHA: (axiom_2) implies:
% 6.97/1.73 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: $i] :
% 6.97/1.73 | (rr(v0, v1) = 0 & cowlThing(v1) = 0 & $i(v1)))
% 6.97/1.73 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (cUnsatisfiable(v0) = 0) | ~ (rr(v0,
% 6.97/1.73 | v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ca_Ax3(v1) = 0)
% 6.97/1.73 |
% 6.97/1.73 | ALPHA: (axiom_3) implies:
% 6.97/1.73 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cc(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | cdxcomp(v0) = 0)
% 6.97/1.73 |
% 6.97/1.73 | ALPHA: (axiom_6) implies:
% 6.97/1.73 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (cd(v0) = 0) | ~ (ra_Px1(v0, v1) = 0)
% 6.97/1.73 | | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 6.97/1.73 |
% 6.97/1.73 | ALPHA: (axiom_7) implies:
% 6.97/1.74 | (5) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (cdxcomp(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: $i] :
% 6.97/1.74 | (ra_Px1(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v1)))
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | ALPHA: (axiom_12) implies:
% 6.97/1.74 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (ca_Ax3(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | (cd(v0) = 0 & cc(v0) =
% 6.97/1.74 | 0))
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | ALPHA: (axiom_13) implies:
% 6.97/1.74 | (7) $i(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903)
% 6.97/1.74 | (8) cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with i2003_11_14_17_22_10903, simplifying with
% 6.97/1.74 | (7), (8) gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (9) ? [v0: $i] : (rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903, v0) = 0 & cowlThing(v0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 | & $i(v0))
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | DELTA: instantiating (9) with fresh symbol all_22_0 gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (10) rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903, all_22_0) = 0 & cowlThing(all_22_0) = 0 &
% 6.97/1.74 | $i(all_22_0)
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | ALPHA: (10) implies:
% 6.97/1.74 | (11) $i(all_22_0)
% 6.97/1.74 | (12) rr(i2003_11_14_17_22_10903, all_22_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with i2003_11_14_17_22_10903, all_22_0,
% 6.97/1.74 | simplifying with (7), (8), (11), (12) gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (13) ca_Ax3(all_22_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_22_0, simplifying with (11), (13)
% 6.97/1.74 | gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (14) cd(all_22_0) = 0 & cc(all_22_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | ALPHA: (14) implies:
% 6.97/1.74 | (15) cc(all_22_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 | (16) cd(all_22_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_22_0, simplifying with (11), (15)
% 6.97/1.74 | gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (17) cdxcomp(all_22_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_22_0, simplifying with (11), (17)
% 6.97/1.74 | gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (18) ? [v0: $i] : (ra_Px1(all_22_0, v0) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | DELTA: instantiating (18) with fresh symbol all_47_0 gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (19) ra_Px1(all_22_0, all_47_0) = 0 & $i(all_47_0)
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | ALPHA: (19) implies:
% 6.97/1.74 | (20) $i(all_47_0)
% 6.97/1.74 | (21) ra_Px1(all_22_0, all_47_0) = 0
% 6.97/1.74 |
% 6.97/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_22_0, all_47_0, simplifying with (11),
% 6.97/1.74 | (16), (20), (21) gives:
% 6.97/1.74 | (22) $false
% 6.97/1.75 |
% 6.97/1.75 | CLOSE: (22) is inconsistent.
% 6.97/1.75 |
% 6.97/1.75 End of proof
% 6.97/1.75 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.97/1.75
% 6.97/1.75 1156ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------