TSTP Solution File: KRS123+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : KRS123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:28:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : KRS123+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 9 00:04:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.38/0.58 % Version: 1.5
% 0.38/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.38/0.58 fof(axiom_12,axiom,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_12)).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c0,plain,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_12])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(axiom_2,axiom,(![X]:(cUnsatisfiable(X)<=>(cc(X)&cd(X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_2)).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c44,plain,(![X]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X)|(cc(X)&cd(X)))&((~cc(X)|~cd(X))|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c45,plain,((![X]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X)|(cc(X)&cd(X))))&(![X]:((~cc(X)|~cd(X))|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c44])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c47,plain,(![X23]:(![X24]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X23)|(cc(X23)&cd(X23)))&((~cc(X24)|~cd(X24))|cUnsatisfiable(X24))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c46,plain,((![X23]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X23)|(cc(X23)&cd(X23))))&(![X24]:((~cc(X24)|~cd(X24))|cUnsatisfiable(X24)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c45])).])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c48,plain,(![X23]:(![X24]:(((~cUnsatisfiable(X23)|cc(X23))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X23)|cd(X23)))&((~cc(X24)|~cd(X24))|cUnsatisfiable(X24))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c47])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c50,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X40)|cd(X40),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c48])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c68,plain,cd(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c50, c0])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(axiom_6,axiom,(![X]:(cd(X)<=>(~(?[Y]:ra_Px1(X,Y))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_6)).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c28,plain,(![X]:((~cd(X)|(![Y]:~ra_Px1(X,Y)))&((?[Y]:ra_Px1(X,Y))|cd(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c29,plain,((![X]:(~cd(X)|(![Y]:~ra_Px1(X,Y))))&(![X]:((?[Y]:ra_Px1(X,Y))|cd(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c30,plain,((![X16]:(~cd(X16)|(![X17]:~ra_Px1(X16,X17))))&(![X18]:((?[X19]:ra_Px1(X18,X19))|cd(X18)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c29])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c32,plain,(![X16]:(![X17]:(![X18]:((~cd(X16)|~ra_Px1(X16,X17))&(ra_Px1(X18,skolem0004(X18))|cd(X18)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c31,plain,((![X16]:(~cd(X16)|(![X17]:~ra_Px1(X16,X17))))&(![X18]:(ra_Px1(X18,skolem0004(X18))|cd(X18)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c30])).])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c33,plain,~cd(X52)|~ra_Px1(X52,X53),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c32])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(axiom_3,axiom,(![X]:(cc(X)=>cdxcomp(X))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_3)).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c41,plain,(![X]:(~cc(X)|cdxcomp(X))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c42,plain,(![X22]:(~cc(X22)|cdxcomp(X22))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c41])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c43,plain,~cc(X37)|cdxcomp(X37),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c42])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c49,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X38)|cc(X38),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c48])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c65,plain,cc(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c49, c0])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c66,plain,cdxcomp(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c65, c43])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(axiom_7,axiom,(![X]:(cdxcomp(X)<=>(?[Y0]:ra_Px1(X,Y0)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_7)).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c21,plain,(![X]:((~cdxcomp(X)|(?[Y0]:ra_Px1(X,Y0)))&((![Y0]:~ra_Px1(X,Y0))|cdxcomp(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c22,plain,((![X]:(~cdxcomp(X)|(?[Y0]:ra_Px1(X,Y0))))&(![X]:((![Y0]:~ra_Px1(X,Y0))|cdxcomp(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c21])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c23,plain,((![X12]:(~cdxcomp(X12)|(?[X13]:ra_Px1(X12,X13))))&(![X14]:((![X15]:~ra_Px1(X14,X15))|cdxcomp(X14)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c22])).
% 0.38/0.58 fof(c25,plain,(![X12]:(![X14]:(![X15]:((~cdxcomp(X12)|ra_Px1(X12,skolem0003(X12)))&(~ra_Px1(X14,X15)|cdxcomp(X14)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c24,plain,((![X12]:(~cdxcomp(X12)|ra_Px1(X12,skolem0003(X12))))&(![X14]:((![X15]:~ra_Px1(X14,X15))|cdxcomp(X14)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c23])).])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c26,plain,~cdxcomp(X51)|ra_Px1(X51,skolem0003(X51)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c25])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c72,plain,ra_Px1(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803,skolem0003(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26, c66])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c74,plain,~cd(i2003_11_14_17_22_02803),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c72, c33])).
% 0.38/0.58 cnf(c75,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c74, c68])).
% 0.38/0.58 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.38/0.58
% 0.38/0.58 % Initial clauses : 21
% 0.38/0.58 % Processed clauses : 25
% 0.38/0.58 % Factors computed : 0
% 0.38/0.58 % Resolvents computed: 11
% 0.38/0.58 % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.38/0.58 % Forward subsumed : 1
% 0.38/0.58 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.58 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.38/0.58 % User time : 0.201 s
% 0.38/0.58 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.38/0.58 % Total time : 0.216 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------