TSTP Solution File: KRS116+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS116+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:31:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.26s 2.49s
% Output   : Proof 2.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS116+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 18:01:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.26/2.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.26/2.49  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.26/2.49  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.26/2.49  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.26/2.49  1. (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (-. (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  2. (rp T_0 T_1) (-. (rp T_0 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  3. (rp T_0 T_1) (-. (rp T_0 T_1))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  4. (T_2 != T_2)   ### Refl(=)
% 2.26/2.49  5. (-. (rp T_0 T_2)) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1)   ### Trans 3 4
% 2.26/2.49  6. (rr T_2 T_3) (-. (rr T_2 T_3))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  7. (rr T_2 T_3) (-. (rr T_2 T_3))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  8. (-. (rinvR T_3 T_2)) (rr T_2 T_3)   ### Definition-Pseudo(rinvR) 7
% 2.26/2.49  9. (-. (rinvP T_2 T_0)) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2)   ### Definition-Pseudo(rinvP) 5
% 2.26/2.49  10. (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (-. (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  11. (-. (rinvS T_0 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0)   ### Definition-Pseudo(rinvS) 10
% 2.26/2.49  12. (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (-. (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  13. (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y)) (-. (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y)))   ### Axiom
% 2.26/2.49  14. (ca (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y))   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca) 13
% 2.26/2.49  15. ((cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) => (ca (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997))) (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y)) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997))   ### Imply 12 14
% 2.26/2.49  16. (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (Ex Y, (ra_Px1 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y))   ### All 15
% 2.26/2.49  17. (caxcomp (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(caxcomp) 16
% 2.26/2.49  18. ((rinvS T_0 (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) => (caxcomp (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997))) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0)   ### Imply 11 17
% 2.26/2.49  19. (All Y, ((rinvS T_0 Y) => (caxcomp Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X)))   ### All 18
% 2.26/2.49  20. (ca_Vx6 T_0) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0)   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Vx6) 19
% 2.26/2.49  21. ((rinvP T_2 T_0) => (ca_Vx6 T_0)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1)   ### Imply 9 20
% 2.26/2.49  22. (All Y, ((rinvP T_2 Y) => (ca_Vx6 Y))) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0)   ### All 21
% 2.26/2.49  23. (ca_Vx7 T_2) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1)   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Vx7) 22
% 2.26/2.49  24. ((rinvR T_3 T_2) => (ca_Vx7 T_2)) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (rr T_2 T_3)   ### Imply 8 23
% 2.26/2.49  25. (All Y, ((rinvR T_3 Y) => (ca_Vx7 Y))) (rr T_2 T_3) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1)   ### All 24
% 2.26/2.49  26. (cc T_3) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (rr T_2 T_3)   ### Definition-Pseudo(cc) 25
% 2.26/2.49  27. ((rr T_2 T_3) => (cc T_3)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1) (rr T_2 T_3)   ### Imply 6 26
% 2.26/2.49  28. (All Y, ((rr T_2 Y) => (cc Y))) (rr T_2 T_3) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0)   ### All 27
% 2.26/2.49  29. (ca_Vx5 T_2) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1) (rr T_2 T_3)   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Vx5) 28
% 2.26/2.49  30. ((rp T_0 T_2) => (ca_Vx5 T_2)) (rr T_2 T_3) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2)   ### Imply 5 29
% 2.26/2.49  31. (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rr T_2 T_3)   ### All 30
% 2.26/2.49  32. ((rr T_2 T_3) /\ (cowlThing T_3)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y)))   ### And 31
% 2.26/2.49  33. (Ex Y, ((rr T_2 Y) /\ (cowlThing Y))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X)))   ### Exists 32
% 2.26/2.49  34. (ca_Vx3 T_2) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Vx3) 33
% 2.26/2.49  35. ((rp T_0 T_2) => (ca_Vx3 T_2)) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_0 T_1) (rp T_1 T_2)   ### Imply 5 34
% 2.26/2.49  36. (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y))) (rp T_1 T_2) (rp T_0 T_1) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y)))   ### All 35
% 2.26/2.49  37. ((rp T_1 T_2) /\ (cowlThing T_2)) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_0 T_1) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y)))   ### And 36
% 2.26/2.49  38. (Ex Y, ((rp T_1 Y) /\ (cowlThing Y))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y))) (rp T_0 T_1) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y)))   ### Exists 37
% 2.26/2.49  39. (ca_Vx4 T_1) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (rp T_0 T_1) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Vx4) 38
% 2.26/2.49  40. ((rp T_0 T_1) => (ca_Vx4 T_1)) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y))) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rp T_0 T_1)   ### Imply 2 39
% 2.26/2.49  41. (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx4 Y))) (rp T_0 T_1) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y)))   ### All 40
% 2.26/2.49  42. ((rp T_0 T_1) /\ (cowlThing T_1)) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y))) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx4 Y)))   ### And 41
% 2.26/2.49  43. (Ex Y, ((rp T_0 Y) /\ (cowlThing Y))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx4 Y))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y)))   ### Exists 42
% 2.26/2.49  44. ((All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx3 Y))) /\ ((All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx5 Y))) /\ ((All Y, ((rr T_0 Y) => (cc Y))) /\ ((Ex Y, ((rr T_0 Y) /\ (cowlThing Y))) /\ ((Ex Y, ((rp T_0 Y) /\ (cowlThing Y))) /\ (All Y, ((rp T_0 Y) => (ca_Vx4 Y)))))))) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0)   ### ConjTree 43
% 2.26/2.49  45. (ca_Ax2 T_0) (rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(ca_Ax2) 44
% 2.26/2.49  46. ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) T_0) /\ (ca_Ax2 T_0)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997))   ### And 45
% 2.26/2.49  47. (Ex Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y) /\ (ca_Ax2 Y))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X)))   ### Exists 46
% 2.26/2.49  48. ((cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) => (Ex Y, ((rs (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997) Y) /\ (ca_Ax2 Y)))) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997))   ### Imply 1 47
% 2.26/2.49  49. (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (Ex Y, ((rs X Y) /\ (ca_Ax2 Y))))) (cUnsatisfiable (i2003_11_14_17_21_33997)) (All X, ((cUnsatisfiable X) => (ca X)))   ### All 48
% 2.26/2.49  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.26/2.49  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------