TSTP Solution File: KRS105+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS105+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.60s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS105+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 17:38:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Tue Jun  7 17:38:20 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11146.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 11
% 0.18/0.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.18/0.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 68
% 0.18/0.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.18/0.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.18/0.37     distinct predicate count: 11
% 0.18/0.37     distinct function count: 3
% 0.18/0.37     distinct constant count: 1
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 5 [ 1 1 231 ] (0.00 seconds, 699 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 6 [ 1 0 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 7 [ 1 1 109 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 8 [ 2 1 22022 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.23 sec ----> 26 [hyper,25,6,22] {-} $F.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Length of proof is 9.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  3 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|cdxcomp(A).
% 0.38/0.60  4 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|cc(A).
% 0.38/0.60  5 [] {+} -cc(A)| -rr(A,B)|cc(B).
% 0.38/0.60  6 [] {+} -cd(A)| -ra_Px1(A,B).
% 0.38/0.60  7 [] {+} -cdxcomp(A)|ra_Px1(A,$f2(A)).
% 0.38/0.60  10 [] {+} ca_Ax2(A)| -cc($f3(A)).
% 0.38/0.60  11 [] {+} -ca_Ax2(A)|cd(A).
% 0.38/0.60  14 [] {+} cd(A)|ra_Px1(A,$f1(A)).
% 0.38/0.60  15 [] {+} ca_Ax2(A)|rr(A,$f3(A)).
% 0.38/0.60  16 [] {+} cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634).
% 0.38/0.60  17 [hyper,16,4] {+} cc(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634).
% 0.38/0.60  18 [hyper,16,3] {+} cdxcomp(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634).
% 0.38/0.60  19 [hyper,15,11] {+} rr(A,$f3(A))|cd(A).
% 0.38/0.60  20 [hyper,18,7] {+} ra_Px1(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634,$f2(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634)).
% 0.38/0.60  21 [hyper,20,6,19] {+} rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634,$f3(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634)).
% 0.38/0.60  22 [hyper,20,6,14] {+} ra_Px1(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634,$f1(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634)).
% 0.38/0.60  23 [hyper,21,5,17] {+} cc($f3(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634)).
% 0.38/0.60  24 [hyper,23,10] {+} ca_Ax2(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634).
% 0.38/0.60  25 [hyper,24,11] {+} cd(i2003_11_14_17_20_53634).
% 0.38/0.60  26 [hyper,25,6,22] {-} $F.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.38/0.60  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  ============ end of search ============
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  true clauses given           7      (50.0%)
% 0.38/0.60  false clauses given          7
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.38/0.60  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Model 8 [ 2 1 22022 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.38/0.60  
% 0.38/0.60  Process 11146 finished Tue Jun  7 17:38:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------