TSTP Solution File: KRS100+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:01:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.70s 1.91s
% Output   : Refutation 1.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(A)
    | ~ rr(A,B)
    | ce(B)
    | ~ cd(B) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(A)
    | ~ rr(A,B)
    | cd(B) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(A)
    | rr(A,dollar_f1(A)) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(A)
    | ~ ce(dollar_f1(A)) ),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704),
    file('KRS100+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704,dollar_f1(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[16,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,16,5')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    cd(dollar_f1(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,4,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,4,16')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ce(dollar_f1(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[18,3,16,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,18,3,16,17')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,6,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,6,16')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:23:09 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.70/1.91  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.70/1.91  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.70/1.91  Wed Jul 27 03:23:10 2022
% 1.70/1.91  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 12315.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.70/1.91  set(auto).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.70/1.91  clear(print_given).
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  formula_list(usable).
% 1.70/1.91  all X (cowlThing(X)& -cowlNothing(X)).
% 1.70/1.91  all X (xsd_string(X)<-> -xsd_integer(X)).
% 1.70/1.91  all X (cUnsatisfiable(X)<-> (all Y (rr(X,Y)->ce(Y)| -cd(Y)))& (all Y (rr(X,Y)->cd(Y)))& (exists Y (rr(X,Y)& -ce(Y)))).
% 1.70/1.91  all X (cc(X)-> -cd(X)).
% 1.70/1.91  cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704).
% 1.70/1.91  end_of_list.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  list(usable).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cowlThing(X).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -cowlNothing(X).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -xsd_string(X)| -xsd_integer(X).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] xsd_string(X)|xsd_integer(X).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -cUnsatisfiable(X)| -rr(X,Y)|ce(Y)| -cd(Y).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -cUnsatisfiable(X)| -rr(X,X1)|cd(X1).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -cUnsatisfiable(X)|rr(X,$f1(X)).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -cUnsatisfiable(X)| -ce($f1(X)).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(X)|rr(X,$f2(X))|rr(X,$f3(X))| -rr(X,X2)|ce(X2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(X)|rr(X,$f2(X))| -cd($f3(X))| -rr(X,X2)|ce(X2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(X)| -ce($f2(X))|rr(X,$f3(X))| -rr(X,X2)|ce(X2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(X)| -ce($f2(X))| -cd($f3(X))| -rr(X,X2)|ce(X2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(X)|cd($f2(X))|rr(X,$f3(X))| -rr(X,X2)|ce(X2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(X)|cd($f2(X))| -cd($f3(X))| -rr(X,X2)|ce(X2).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] -cc(X)| -cd(X).
% 1.70/1.91  0 [] cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704).
% 1.70/1.91  end_of_list.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.70/1.91  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.70/1.91  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.70/1.91     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ------------> process usable:
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 1 [] -cowlNothing(A).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 2 [] -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 3 [] -cUnsatisfiable(A)| -rr(A,B)|ce(B)| -cd(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 4 [] -cUnsatisfiable(A)| -rr(A,B)|cd(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] -cUnsatisfiable(A)|rr(A,$f1(A)).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 6 [] -cUnsatisfiable(A)| -ce($f1(A)).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 7 [] cUnsatisfiable(A)|rr(A,$f2(A))|rr(A,$f3(A))| -rr(A,B)|ce(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 8 [] cUnsatisfiable(A)|rr(A,$f2(A))| -cd($f3(A))| -rr(A,B)|ce(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 9 [] cUnsatisfiable(A)| -ce($f2(A))|rr(A,$f3(A))| -rr(A,B)|ce(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 10 [] cUnsatisfiable(A)| -ce($f2(A))| -cd($f3(A))| -rr(A,B)|ce(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 11 [] cUnsatisfiable(A)|cd($f2(A))|rr(A,$f3(A))| -rr(A,B)|ce(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 12 [] cUnsatisfiable(A)|cd($f2(A))| -cd($f3(A))| -rr(A,B)|ce(B).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 13 [] -cc(A)| -cd(A).
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ------------> process sos:
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] cowlThing(A).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 1.70/1.91  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 16 [] cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704).
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 20 [hyper,19,6,16] $F.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.70/1.91  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.70/1.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.70/1.91  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ============ end of search ============
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.70/1.91  clauses given                  6
% 1.70/1.91  clauses generated              6
% 1.70/1.91  clauses kept                  19
% 1.70/1.91  clauses forward subsumed       2
% 1.70/1.91  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.70/1.91  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.70/1.91  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.70/1.91  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.70/1.91  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.70/1.91  
% 1.70/1.91  Process 12315 finished Wed Jul 27 03:23:11 2022
% 1.70/1.91  Otter interrupted
% 1.70/1.91  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------