TSTP Solution File: KRS100+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.34s 1.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   4 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  16   ~;  12   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  12   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (;  13   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ rr > xsd_string > xsd_integer > cowlThing > cowlNothing > ce > cd > cc > cUnsatisfiable > #nlpp > i2003_11_14_17_20_32704 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(ce,type,
    ce: $i > $o ).

tff(rr,type,
    rr: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff(cc,type,
    cc: $i > $o ).

tff(cowlThing,type,
    cowlThing: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(cUnsatisfiable,type,
    cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_integer,type,
    xsd_integer: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_string,type,
    xsd_string: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704,type,
    i2003_11_14_17_20_32704: $i ).

tff(cd,type,
    cd: $i > $o ).

tff(cowlNothing,type,
    cowlNothing: $i > $o ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ! [Y] :
            ( rr(X,Y)
           => ( ce(Y)
              | ~ cd(Y) ) )
        & ! [Y] :
            ( rr(X,Y)
           => cd(Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( rr(X,Y)
            & ~ ce(Y) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

tff(f_71,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_3] :
      ( rr(X_3,'#skF_3'(X_3))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_3) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [Y_21,X_22] :
      ( cd(Y_21)
      | ~ rr(X_22,Y_21)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_22) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ! [X_3] :
      ( cd('#skF_3'(X_3))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_3) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_44]) ).

tff(c_49,plain,
    ! [Y_23,X_24] :
      ( ~ cd(Y_23)
      | ce(Y_23)
      | ~ rr(X_24,Y_23)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_24) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    ! [X_27] :
      ( ~ cd('#skF_3'(X_27))
      | ce('#skF_3'(X_27))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_27) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_49]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [X_3] :
      ( ~ ce('#skF_3'(X_3))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_3) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_65,plain,
    ! [X_28] :
      ( ~ cd('#skF_3'(X_28))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_28) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_10]) ).

tff(c_69,plain,
    ! [X_3] : ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_3),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_65]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_32704),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_71]) ).

tff(c_71,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : KRS100+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.19/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:56:23 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.34/1.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.34/1.67  
% 2.34/1.67  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.34/1.70  
% 2.34/1.70  Inference rules
% 2.34/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.34/1.70  #Ref     : 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Sup     : 6
% 2.34/1.70  #Fact    : 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Define  : 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Split   : 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Chain   : 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Close   : 0
% 2.34/1.70  
% 2.34/1.70  Ordering : KBO
% 2.34/1.70  
% 2.34/1.70  Simplification rules
% 2.34/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.34/1.70  #Subsume      : 8
% 2.34/1.70  #Demod        : 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Tautology    : 1
% 2.34/1.70  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 2.34/1.70  #BackRed      : 1
% 2.34/1.70  
% 2.34/1.70  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.34/1.70  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.34/1.70  
% 2.34/1.70  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.34/1.70  ----------------------
% 2.34/1.70  Preprocessing        : 0.42
% 2.34/1.70  Parsing              : 0.23
% 2.34/1.70  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 2.34/1.70  Main loop            : 0.21
% 2.34/1.70  Inferencing          : 0.09
% 2.34/1.70  Reduction            : 0.04
% 2.34/1.70  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 2.34/1.70  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 2.34/1.70  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 2.34/1.70  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 2.34/1.70  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.34/1.70  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.34/1.70  Total                : 0.68
% 2.34/1.70  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.34/1.70  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.34/1.70  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.34/1.70  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------