TSTP Solution File: KRS098+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS098+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.47s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 43 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 43 RR)
% Number of literals : 92 ( 9 equ; 53 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 12 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_49,plain,
( rr(X1,X2)
| ~ rr3(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_49) ).
cnf(i_0_86,plain,
( rr3(X1,esk5_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_86) ).
cnf(i_0_48,plain,
( rtt(X1,X2)
| ~ rt2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).
cnf(i_0_80,plain,
( rt2(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_80) ).
cnf(i_0_78,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ epred1_1(X3)
| ~ rr(X3,X2)
| ~ rr(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_78) ).
cnf(i_0_46,plain,
( rr(X1,X2)
| ~ rr2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_46) ).
cnf(i_0_82,plain,
( rr2(X1,esk7_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_82) ).
cnf(i_0_81,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ epred1_1(X3)
| ~ rtt(esk7_1(X3),X2)
| ~ rtt(esk7_1(X3),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_81) ).
cnf(i_0_50,plain,
( rtt(X1,X2)
| ~ rt3(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).
cnf(i_0_85,plain,
( rt3(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).
cnf(i_0_44,plain,
( ~ cd(X1)
| ~ ce(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(i_0_84,plain,
( ce(esk6_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_84) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_41,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_25524),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(i_0_79,plain,
( cd(esk8_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lzdxdzn0/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
( rr(X1,X2)
| ~ rr3(X1,X2) ),
i_0_49 ).
cnf(c_0_103,plain,
( rr3(X1,esk5_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_86 ).
cnf(c_0_104,plain,
( rtt(X1,X2)
| ~ rt2(X1,X2) ),
i_0_48 ).
cnf(c_0_105,plain,
( rt2(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_80 ).
cnf(c_0_106,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ epred1_1(X3)
| ~ rr(X3,X2)
| ~ rr(X3,X1) ),
i_0_78 ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
( rr(X1,esk5_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]) ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
( rr(X1,X2)
| ~ rr2(X1,X2) ),
i_0_46 ).
cnf(c_0_109,plain,
( rr2(X1,esk7_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_82 ).
cnf(c_0_110,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ epred1_1(X3)
| ~ rtt(esk7_1(X3),X2)
| ~ rtt(esk7_1(X3),X1) ),
i_0_81 ).
cnf(c_0_111,plain,
( rtt(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( X1 = esk5_1(X2)
| ~ rr(X2,X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_107]) ).
cnf(c_0_113,plain,
( rr(X1,esk7_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_109]) ).
cnf(c_0_114,plain,
( X1 = esk8_1(X2)
| ~ rtt(esk7_1(X2),X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111]) ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( esk7_1(X1) = esk5_1(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_113]) ).
cnf(c_0_116,plain,
( rtt(X1,X2)
| ~ rt3(X1,X2) ),
i_0_50 ).
cnf(c_0_117,plain,
( rt3(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_85 ).
cnf(c_0_118,plain,
( X1 = esk8_1(X2)
| ~ rtt(esk5_1(X2),X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]) ).
cnf(c_0_119,plain,
( rtt(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_117]) ).
cnf(c_0_120,plain,
( ~ cd(X1)
| ~ ce(X1) ),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_121,plain,
( ce(esk6_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_84 ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( epred1_1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_123,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_25524),
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_124,plain,
( cd(esk8_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
i_0_79 ).
cnf(c_0_125,plain,
( esk8_1(X1) = esk6_1(X1)
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119]) ).
cnf(c_0_126,plain,
( ~ cd(esk6_1(X1))
| ~ epred1_1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]) ).
cnf(c_0_127,plain,
epred1_1(i2003_11_14_17_20_25524),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_123]) ).
cnf(c_0_128,plain,
~ epred1_1(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]),c_0_126]) ).
cnf(c_0_129,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_128]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS098+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 20:07:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.47/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.47/2.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.47/2.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.47/2.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 7.47/2.39 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 7.47/2.39 #
% 7.47/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.47/2.39
% 7.47/2.39 # Proof found!
% 7.47/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.47/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.47/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.47/2.39
% 7.47/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.47/2.39 # User time : 0.025 s
% 7.47/2.39 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.47/2.39 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 7.47/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.47/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------