TSTP Solution File: KRS077+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : KRS077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:12:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   57 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  156 (  58   ~;  66   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   26 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   1 sgn  23   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ( ! [X5,X6] :
            ( ( rr(X4,X5)
              & rr(X4,X6) )
           => X5 = X6 )
        & ? [X7] :
            ( rr(X4,X7)
            & ! [X8] :
                ( rinvS(X7,X8)
               => cp(X8) ) )
        & ~ cp(X4)
        & ? [X7] :
            ( rs(X4,X7)
            & cp(X7) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwIaP9thiR/E---3.1_23756.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X4,X7] :
      ( rs(X4,X7)
     => rr(X4,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwIaP9thiR/E---3.1_23756.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X7] :
      ( rinvS(X4,X7)
    <=> rs(X7,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwIaP9thiR/E---3.1_23756.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwIaP9thiR/E---3.1_23756.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ( ! [X5,X6] :
            ( ( rr(X4,X5)
              & rr(X4,X6) )
           => X5 = X6 )
        & ? [X7] :
            ( rr(X4,X7)
            & ! [X8] :
                ( rinvS(X7,X8)
               => cp(X8) ) )
        & ~ cp(X4)
        & ? [X7] :
            ( rs(X4,X7)
            & cp(X7) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43,X45,X47,X50,X52] :
      ( ( ~ rr(X41,X42)
        | ~ rr(X41,X43)
        | X42 = X43
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( rr(X41,esk1_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( ~ rinvS(esk1_1(X41),X45)
        | cp(X45)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( ~ cp(X41)
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( rs(X41,esk2_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( cp(esk2_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( rinvS(X50,esk5_2(X47,X50))
        | ~ rr(X47,X50)
        | rr(X47,esk3_1(X47))
        | cp(X47)
        | ~ rs(X47,X52)
        | ~ cp(X52)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X47) )
      & ( ~ cp(esk5_2(X47,X50))
        | ~ rr(X47,X50)
        | rr(X47,esk3_1(X47))
        | cp(X47)
        | ~ rs(X47,X52)
        | ~ cp(X52)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X47) )
      & ( rinvS(X50,esk5_2(X47,X50))
        | ~ rr(X47,X50)
        | rr(X47,esk4_1(X47))
        | cp(X47)
        | ~ rs(X47,X52)
        | ~ cp(X52)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X47) )
      & ( ~ cp(esk5_2(X47,X50))
        | ~ rr(X47,X50)
        | rr(X47,esk4_1(X47))
        | cp(X47)
        | ~ rs(X47,X52)
        | ~ cp(X52)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X47) )
      & ( rinvS(X50,esk5_2(X47,X50))
        | ~ rr(X47,X50)
        | esk3_1(X47) != esk4_1(X47)
        | cp(X47)
        | ~ rs(X47,X52)
        | ~ cp(X52)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X47) )
      & ( ~ cp(esk5_2(X47,X50))
        | ~ rr(X47,X50)
        | esk3_1(X47) != esk4_1(X47)
        | cp(X47)
        | ~ rs(X47,X52)
        | ~ cp(X52)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X47) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X55,X56] :
      ( ~ rs(X55,X56)
      | rr(X55,X56) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] :
      ( ( ~ rinvS(X53,X54)
        | rs(X54,X53) )
      & ( ~ rs(X54,X53)
        | rinvS(X53,X54) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X3)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( rs(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( cp(X2)
    | ~ rinvS(esk1_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( rinvS(X2,X1)
    | ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = esk1_1(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( cp(X1)
    | ~ rs(X1,esk1_1(X2))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( esk1_1(X1) = esk2_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( cp(X1)
    | ~ rs(X1,esk2_1(X2))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ cp(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_11]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : KRS077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 13:35:20 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.KwIaP9thiR/E---3.1_23756.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23851 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 23870 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 18
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 32
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 13
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 47
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 13
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 18
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 17
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 34
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 441
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 196
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2581
% 0.19/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 540
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.039 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.050 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------