TSTP Solution File: KRS077+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KRS077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.68s 1.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   7 unt;  15 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  21   ~;  18   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  14   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (;  26   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ rs > rr > rinvS > xsd_string > xsd_integer > cp > cowlThing > cowlNothing > cUnsatisfiable > #nlpp > i2003_11_14_17_19_09372 > #skF_5 > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_1 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i > $i ).

tff(rr,type,
    rr: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(cowlThing,type,
    cowlThing: $i > $o ).

tff(rinvS,type,
    rinvS: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(rs,type,
    rs: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(cUnsatisfiable,type,
    cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_integer,type,
    xsd_integer: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_string,type,
    xsd_string: $i > $o ).

tff(cp,type,
    cp: $i > $o ).

tff(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372,type,
    i2003_11_14_17_19_09372: $i ).

tff(cowlNothing,type,
    cowlNothing: $i > $o ).

tff(f_144,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

tff(f_137,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ! [Y0,Y1] :
            ( ( rr(X,Y0)
              & rr(X,Y1) )
           => ( Y0 = Y1 ) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( rr(X,Y)
            & ! [Z] :
                ( rinvS(Y,Z)
               => cp(Z) ) )
        & ~ cp(X)
        & ? [Y] :
            ( rs(X,Y)
            & cp(Y) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

tff(f_148,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rs(X,Y)
     => rr(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

tff(f_142,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rinvS(X,Y)
    <=> rs(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_144]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    ! [X_69] :
      ( rs(X_69,'#skF_5'(X_69))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_69) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ! [X_55,Y_56] :
      ( rr(X_55,Y_56)
      | ~ rs(X_55,Y_56) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_148]) ).

tff(c_91,plain,
    ! [X_69] :
      ( rr(X_69,'#skF_5'(X_69))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_69) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_64]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X_33] :
      ( rr(X_33,'#skF_4'(X_33))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_105,plain,
    ! [Y1_78,Y0_79,X_80] :
      ( ( Y1_78 = Y0_79 )
      | ~ rr(X_80,Y1_78)
      | ~ rr(X_80,Y0_79)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_80) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ! [Y0_81,X_82] :
      ( ( Y0_81 = '#skF_4'(X_82) )
      | ~ rr(X_82,Y0_81)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_82) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_105]) ).

tff(c_130,plain,
    ! [X_86] :
      ( ( '#skF_5'(X_86) = '#skF_4'(X_86) )
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_86) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_115]) ).

tff(c_134,plain,
    '#skF_5'(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372) = '#skF_4'(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_130]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ! [X_33] :
      ( rs(X_33,'#skF_5'(X_33))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_92,plain,
    ! [X_70,Y_71] :
      ( rinvS(X_70,Y_71)
      | ~ rs(Y_71,X_70) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_142]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ! [X_33] :
      ( rinvS('#skF_5'(X_33),X_33)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_33) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_92]) ).

tff(c_138,plain,
    ( rinvS('#skF_4'(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),i2003_11_14_17_19_09372)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_134,c_99]) ).

tff(c_154,plain,
    rinvS('#skF_4'(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_138]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [Z_52,X_33] :
      ( cp(Z_52)
      | ~ rinvS('#skF_4'(X_33),Z_52)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_192,plain,
    ( cp(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_40]) ).

tff(c_195,plain,
    cp(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_192]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [X_33] :
      ( ~ cp(X_33)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_137]) ).

tff(c_198,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_09372),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_38]) ).

tff(c_202,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_62,c_198]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : KRS077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:07:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.68/1.94  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/1.94  
% 3.68/1.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.68/1.97  
% 3.68/1.97  Inference rules
% 3.68/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.68/1.97  #Ref     : 0
% 3.68/1.97  #Sup     : 27
% 3.68/1.97  #Fact    : 0
% 3.68/1.97  #Define  : 0
% 3.68/1.97  #Split   : 0
% 3.68/1.97  #Chain   : 0
% 3.79/1.97  #Close   : 0
% 3.79/1.97  
% 3.79/1.97  Ordering : KBO
% 3.79/1.97  
% 3.79/1.97  Simplification rules
% 3.79/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.79/1.97  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.79/1.97  #Demod        : 10
% 3.79/1.97  #Tautology    : 19
% 3.79/1.97  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.79/1.97  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.79/1.97  
% 3.79/1.97  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.79/1.97  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.79/1.97  
% 3.79/1.97  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.79/1.97  ----------------------
% 3.79/1.98  Preprocessing        : 0.53
% 3.79/1.98  Parsing              : 0.28
% 3.79/1.98  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.79/1.98  Main loop            : 0.24
% 3.79/1.98  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.79/1.98  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.79/1.98  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.79/1.98  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.79/1.98  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.79/1.98  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.79/1.98  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.79/1.98  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.79/1.98  Total                : 0.82
% 3.79/1.98  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.79/1.98  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.79/1.98  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.79/1.98  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------