TSTP Solution File: KRS076+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : KRS076+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:52:49 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.43s
% Output   : Proof 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : KRS076+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 02:06:10 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.43  Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 0.22/0.43  
% 0.22/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.43  
% 0.22/0.43  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.43  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_0, axiom, ![X]: (cowlThing(X) & ~cowlNothing(X))).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_1, axiom, ![X2]: (xsd_string(X2) <=> ~xsd_integer(X2))).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_10, axiom, ![Y, X2]: (rs(X2, Y) => rf1(X2, Y))).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_11, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: (rs(X2, Y2) => rf(X2, Y2))).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_2, axiom, ![X2]: (cUnsatisfiable(X2) <=> (?[Y2]: (rf(X2, Y2) & cp(Y2)) & ?[Y2]: (rf1(X2, Y2) & (~cp(Y2) & ![Z]: (rinvF1(Y2, Z) => ?[W]: (rs(Z, W) & cowlThing(W)))))))).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_3, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2]: ((rf(X2, Y2) & rf(X2, Z2)) => Y2=Z2)).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_4, axiom, ![X2, Y2, Z2]: ((rf1(X2, Y2) & rf1(X2, Z2)) => Y2=Z2)).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_6, axiom, ![X2, Y2]: (rinvF1(X2, Y2) <=> rf1(Y2, X2))).
% 0.22/0.44    fof(axiom_9, axiom, cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)).
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.22/0.44  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.22/0.44  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.22/0.44    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.22/0.44    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.22/0.44  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.22/0.44  variables of u and v.
% 0.22/0.44  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.22/0.44  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 1 (axiom_9): cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 2 (axiom_2): fresh19(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 3 (axiom_2_1): fresh18(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 4 (axiom_2_2): fresh17(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 5 (axiom_2_5): fresh13(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 6 (axiom_11): fresh21(X, X, Y, Z) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 7 (axiom_10): fresh20(X, X, Y, Z) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 8 (axiom_2): fresh19(cUnsatisfiable(X), true2, X) = cp(y2(X)).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 9 (axiom_2_1): fresh18(cUnsatisfiable(X), true2, X) = rf(X, y2(X)).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 10 (axiom_2_2): fresh17(cUnsatisfiable(X), true2, X) = rf1(X, y(X)).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 11 (axiom_2_5): fresh14(X, X, Y, Z) = rs(Z, w(Z)).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 12 (axiom_6): fresh10(X, X, Y, Z) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 13 (axiom_3): fresh5(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 14 (axiom_4): fresh3(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 15 (axiom_11): fresh21(rs(X, Y), true2, X, Y) = rf(X, Y).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 16 (axiom_10): fresh20(rs(X, Y), true2, X, Y) = rf1(X, Y).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 17 (axiom_6): fresh10(rf1(X, Y), true2, Y, X) = rinvF1(Y, X).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 18 (axiom_3): fresh6(X, X, Y, Z, W) = Z.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 19 (axiom_4): fresh4(X, X, Y, Z, W) = Z.
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 20 (axiom_2_5): fresh14(rinvF1(y(X), Y), true2, X, Y) = fresh13(cUnsatisfiable(X), true2, Y).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 21 (axiom_3): fresh6(rf(X, Y), true2, X, Z, Y) = fresh5(rf(X, Z), true2, Z, Y).
% 0.22/0.44  Axiom 22 (axiom_4): fresh4(rf1(X, Y), true2, X, Z, Y) = fresh3(rf1(X, Z), true2, Z, Y).
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  Lemma 23: rf1(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Proof:
% 0.22/0.44    rf1(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 10 (axiom_2_2) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh17(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_9) }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh17(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 4 (axiom_2_2) }
% 0.22/0.44    true2
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  Lemma 24: rs(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)) = true2.
% 0.22/0.44  Proof:
% 0.22/0.44    rs(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 11 (axiom_2_5) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh14(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 12 (axiom_6) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh14(fresh10(true2, true2, y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by lemma 23 R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh14(fresh10(rf1(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 17 (axiom_6) }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh14(rinvF1(y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 20 (axiom_2_5) }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh13(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_9) }
% 0.22/0.44    fresh13(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 5 (axiom_2_5) }
% 0.22/0.44    true2
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  Goal 1 (axiom_2_3): tuple(cUnsatisfiable(X), cp(y(X))) = tuple(true2, true2).
% 0.22/0.44  The goal is true when:
% 0.22/0.44    X = i2003_11_14_17_19_06193
% 0.22/0.44  
% 0.22/0.44  Proof:
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 14 (axiom_4) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh3(true2, true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 7 (axiom_10) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh3(fresh20(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by lemma 24 R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh3(fresh20(rs(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 16 (axiom_10) }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh3(rf1(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 22 (axiom_4) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh4(rf1(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by lemma 23 }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh4(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 19 (axiom_4) }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 18 (axiom_3) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh6(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 3 (axiom_2_1) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh6(fresh18(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_9) R->L }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh6(fresh18(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 9 (axiom_2_1) }
% 0.22/0.44    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh6(rf(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.44  = { by axiom 21 (axiom_3) }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh5(rf(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 15 (axiom_11) R->L }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh5(fresh21(rs(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by lemma 24 }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh5(fresh21(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)), true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 6 (axiom_11) }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(fresh5(true2, true2, w(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 13 (axiom_3) }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), cp(y2(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193)))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 8 (axiom_2) R->L }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), fresh19(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_9) }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), fresh19(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_19_06193))
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 2 (axiom_2) }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_06193), true2)
% 0.22/0.45  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_9) }
% 0.22/0.45    tuple(true2, true2)
% 0.22/0.45  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------