TSTP Solution File: KRS074+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KRS074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 18:21:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.35  Tue Jun  7 18:21:51 2022
% 0.18/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 15598.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.35  19 back subsumes 2.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.35  44 back subsumes 3.
% 0.18/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 47 during input processing: 0 [copy,47,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.35  47 back subsumes 43.
% 0.18/0.35  47 back subsumes 42.
% 0.18/0.35  47 back subsumes 41.
% 0.18/0.35  
% 0.18/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 38
% 0.18/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 42
% 0.18/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.18/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 88
% 0.18/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.18/0.39     distinct predicate count: 13
% 0.18/0.39     distinct function count: 3
% 0.18/0.39     distinct constant count: 1
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.39  
% 0.18/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 3 [ 1 1 141 ] (0.00 seconds, 3357 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 4 [ 1 1 157 ] (0.00 seconds, 3998 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 5 [ 1 2 15639 ] (0.00 seconds, 17949 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 6 [ 2 0 134 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 7 [ 2 1 136 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 8 [ 1 0 4063 ] (0.00 seconds, 7190 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.19 sec ----> 86 [hyper,51,25,46,50] {-} $F.
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 1.
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  21 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|rs(A,$f2(A)).
% 0.38/0.57  22 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)|cp($f2(A)).
% 0.38/0.57  25 [] {+} -cUnsatisfiable(A)| -rs(A,B)| -cp(B).
% 0.38/0.57  46 [] {-} cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896).
% 0.38/0.57  50 [hyper,46,22] {+} cp($f2(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896)).
% 0.38/0.57  51 [hyper,46,21] {+} rs(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896,$f2(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896)).
% 0.38/0.57  86 [hyper,51,25,46,50] {-} $F.
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.38/0.57  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  ============ end of search ============
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  true clauses given           1      (11.1%)
% 0.38/0.57  false clauses given          8
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.38/0.57     5  0         1
% 0.38/0.57     8  0         2
% 0.38/0.57     9  0         12
% 0.38/0.57    11  0         12
% 0.38/0.57    14  0         3
% 0.38/0.57  tot:  0         30      (100.0% true)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Model 8 [ 1 0 4063 ] (0.00 seconds, 7190 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.38/0.57  
% 0.38/0.57  Process 15598 finished Tue Jun  7 18:21:52 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------