TSTP Solution File: KRS074+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:16:06 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 23 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 61 ( 23 ~; 20 |; 14 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 18 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 1 sgn 9 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X4] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
<=> ( ? [X5] :
( rs(X4,X5)
& cp(X5)
& ? [X6] :
( rinvS(X5,X6)
& cp(X6) ) )
& ! [X5] :
( rs(X4,X5)
=> ~ cp(X5) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_9,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).
fof(c_0_2,plain,
! [X4] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
<=> ( ? [X5] :
( rs(X4,X5)
& cp(X5)
& ? [X6] :
( rinvS(X5,X6)
& cp(X6) ) )
& ! [X5] :
( rs(X4,X5)
=> ~ cp(X5) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X57,X60,X61,X62,X63] :
( ( rs(X57,esk1_1(X57))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X57) )
& ( cp(esk1_1(X57))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X57) )
& ( rinvS(esk1_1(X57),esk2_1(X57))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X57) )
& ( cp(esk2_1(X57))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X57) )
& ( ~ rs(X57,X60)
| ~ cp(X60)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X57) )
& ( rs(X61,esk3_1(X61))
| ~ rs(X61,X62)
| ~ cp(X62)
| ~ rinvS(X62,X63)
| ~ cp(X63)
| cUnsatisfiable(X61) )
& ( cp(esk3_1(X61))
| ~ rs(X61,X62)
| ~ cp(X62)
| ~ rinvS(X62,X63)
| ~ cp(X63)
| cUnsatisfiable(X61) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ rs(X1,X2)
| ~ cp(X2)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( rs(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( cp(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_59896),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : KRS074+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 22:29:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 17651 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 17666 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 30
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 41
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 41
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 41
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 7
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 27
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 30
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 126
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2729
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 636
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1824 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1724 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------