TSTP Solution File: KRS072+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : KRS072+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.46s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
cp1(skf7(u)),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
rr(skf6(u),skf7(u)),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| cp2(u) ),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
( ~ cp1(u)
| ~ cp2(u) ),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(19,axiom,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| rinvR(u,skf6(u)) ),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(20,axiom,
( ~ rinvR(u,v)
| rr(v,u) ),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(22,axiom,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ rr(skf6(u),v)
| ~ rr(skf6(u),w)
| equal(v,w) ),
file('KRS072+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(29,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ rr(skf6(u),v)
| equal(skf7(u),v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[6,22]),
[iquote('0:Res:6.0,22.1')] ).
cnf(35,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ rinvR(v,skf6(u))
| equal(skf7(u),v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,29]),
[iquote('0:Res:20.1,29.1')] ).
cnf(36,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| equal(skf7(u),u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[19,35]),
[iquote('0:Res:19.1,35.1')] ).
cnf(38,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| equal(skf7(u),u) ),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[36]),
[iquote('0:Obv:36.0')] ).
cnf(41,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| cp1(u) ),
inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[38,4]),
[iquote('0:SpR:38.1,4.0')] ).
cnf(45,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(u)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(u) ),
inference(ems,[status(thm)],[10,41,7]),
[iquote('0:EmS:10.0,10.1,41.1,7.1')] ).
cnf(46,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(u),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[45]),
[iquote('0:Obv:45.0')] ).
cnf(47,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[46,2]),
[iquote('0:UnC:46.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : KRS072+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 20:30:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.46 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS derived 18 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 38 clauses.
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS allocated 97945 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.46 SPASS spent 0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.46 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46
% 0.19/0.46 Here is a proof with depth 5, length 16 :
% 0.19/0.46 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46 Formulae used in the proof : axiom_8 axiom_2 axiom_3 axiom_7
% 0.19/0.46
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------