TSTP Solution File: KRS069+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : KRS069+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:12:55 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  105 (  43   ~;  38   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   1 sgn  27   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ( ? [X5] :
            ( rf1(X4,X5)
            & cp1(X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( rf2(X4,X5)
            & ~ cp1(X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( rf3(X4,X5)
            & cp2(X5) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_4,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( rf2(X4,X5)
        & rf2(X4,X6) )
     => X5 = X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p',axiom_4) ).

fof(axiom_8,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rf3(X4,X5)
     => rf2(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p',axiom_8) ).

fof(axiom_7,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( rf3(X4,X5)
     => rf1(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p',axiom_7) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( rf1(X4,X5)
        & rf1(X4,X6) )
     => X5 = X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_6,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_2750),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p',axiom_6) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X4)
    <=> ( ? [X5] :
            ( rf1(X4,X5)
            & cp1(X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( rf2(X4,X5)
            & ~ cp1(X5) )
        & ? [X5] :
            ( rf3(X4,X5)
            & cp2(X5) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X52,X53,X54] :
      ( ~ rf2(X52,X53)
      | ~ rf2(X52,X54)
      | X53 = X54 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X41,X45,X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ( rf1(X41,esk1_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( cp1(esk1_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( rf2(X41,esk2_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( ~ cp1(esk2_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( rf3(X41,esk3_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( cp2(esk3_1(X41))
        | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X41) )
      & ( ~ rf1(X45,X46)
        | ~ cp1(X46)
        | ~ rf2(X45,X47)
        | cp1(X47)
        | ~ rf3(X45,X48)
        | ~ cp2(X48)
        | cUnsatisfiable(X45) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X60,X61] :
      ( ~ rf3(X60,X61)
      | rf2(X60,X61) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X58,X59] :
      ( ~ rf3(X58,X59)
      | rf1(X58,X59) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ rf2(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf2(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( rf2(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( rf2(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf3(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( rf3(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X49,X50,X51] :
      ( ~ rf1(X49,X50)
      | ~ rf1(X49,X51)
      | X50 = X51 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( rf1(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf3(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = esk2_1(X2)
    | ~ rf2(X2,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( rf2(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( X2 = X3
    | ~ rf1(X1,X2)
    | ~ rf1(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( rf1(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ cp1(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( esk2_1(X1) = esk3_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = esk3_1(X2)
    | ~ rf1(X2,X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( rf1(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ cp1(esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( esk3_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( cp1(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_2750),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : KRS069+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 13:49:34 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IPYRlANAhF/E---3.1_11556.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 11634 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 11647 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 22
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 43
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 42
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 15
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 21
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 14
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 33
% 0.21/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 111
% 0.21/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72
% 0.21/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.21/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.21/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2211
% 0.21/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 470
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1784 pages
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.21/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------