TSTP Solution File: KRS054+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS054+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:11:58 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : Saturation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ cB(X1)
| ~ cC(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ cD(X1)
| ~ cA(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ cE(X1)
| ~ cA(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ cE(X1)
| ~ cD(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( xsd_integer(X1)
| xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : KRS054+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:35:10 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IYyge6CLPF/E---3.1_12696.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 12774 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 12785 completed with status 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # No proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 370
% 0.22/0.52 # Search garbage collected termcells : 61
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------