TSTP Solution File: KRS042+1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : KRS042+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:18:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.36s
% Output   : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS042+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 05:43:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.12/0.36  % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SZS output start Saturation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.36  |- ~cowlNothing $X
% 0.12/0.36  |- cowlThing $X
% 0.12/0.36  |- ~xsd_integer $X \/ ~xsd_string $X
% 0.12/0.36  |- xsd_integer $X \/ xsd_string $X
% 0.12/0.36  |- ~cSatisfiable $X \/ ca_Cx1 $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~cSatisfiable $X \/ cc1 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~cSatisfiable $X \/ cc2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~cSatisfiable $X \/ rrx3a $X (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~cSatisfiable $X \/ rrx4a $X (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Cx1 $X \/ ~cc1 $Y \/ ~cc2 $Y' \/ ~rrx3a $X $Y \/ ~rrx4a $X $Y' \/
% 0.19/0.36     cSatisfiable $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Ax2 $X \/ cc1 $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Ax2 $X \/ cc2 $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~cc1 $X \/ ~cc2 $X \/ ca_Ax2 $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Cx1 $X \/ ra_Px1 $X (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y0 $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ra_Px1 $X $Y0 \/ ca_Cx1 $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Cx1xcomp $X \/ ca_Ax2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Cx1xcomp $X \/ rrx3a $X (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Ax2 $Y \/ ~rrx3a $X $Y \/ ca_Cx1xcomp $X
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Cx1xcomp $X \/ ~ra_Px1 $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1xcomp $X \/ ra_Px1 $X (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_3 $X)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx $X $Y \/ ~rrx $X $Z \/ $Y = $Z
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3 $X $Y \/ ~rrx3 $X $Z \/ $Y = $Z
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3a $X $Y \/ ~rrx3a $X $Z \/ $Y = $Z
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4 $X $Y \/ ~rrx4 $X $Z \/ $Y = $Z
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4a $X $Y \/ ~rrx4a $X $Z \/ $Y = $Z
% 0.19/0.36  |- cSatisfiable i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3a $X $Y \/ rrx1a $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4 $X $Y \/ rrx $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3 $X $Y \/ rrx $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4a $X $Y \/ rrxa $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3a $X $Y \/ rrxa $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3 $X $Y \/ rrx1 $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4a $X $Y \/ rrx2a $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4 $X $Y \/ rrx2 $X $Y
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36  |- cc1 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- cc2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ra_Px1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36       (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y0 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Cx1xcomp i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36  |- rrx3a i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36       (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- rrx4a i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 $_17 \/ ca_Cx1xcomp $_17
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 $_19 \/ rrx3a $_19 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_19)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Ax2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_19) \/ ca_Cx1 $_19
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 $_20 \/ cc2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_20)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 $_20 \/ cc1 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_20)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~cc1 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980) \/
% 0.19/0.36     ca_Ax2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- rrx1a i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36       (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 $_25 \/ rrx1a $_25 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_25)
% 0.19/0.36  |- rrxa i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- rrxa i2003_11_14_17_16_10980
% 0.19/0.36       (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ca_Cx1 $_34 \/ rrxa $_34 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_34)
% 0.19/0.36  |- rrx2a i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~ca_Ax2 (skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980)
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3a i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 $_53 \/
% 0.19/0.36     skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_1 i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 = $_53
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx3a $_51 $_53 \/ skolemFOFtoCNF_Y_2 $_51 = $_53 \/ ca_Cx1 $_51
% 0.19/0.36  |- ~rrx4a i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 $_62 \/
% 0.19/0.36     skolemFOFtoCNF_Y i2003_11_14_17_16_10980 = $_62
% 0.19/0.36  SZS output end Saturation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------