TSTP Solution File: KRS039+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : KRS039+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:17:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.53s
% Output   : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ rinvR(esk2_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ rr1(X2,X3)
    | ~ cp(X3)
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( rinvR(X2,X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( cp(X3)
    | ~ rinvR(esk1_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ rr1(X2,X3)
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ cp(X1)
    | ~ rr1(X2,X1)
    | ~ rr(X2,esk2_1(X3))
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( cp(X1)
    | ~ rr1(X2,X1)
    | ~ rr(X2,esk1_1(X3))
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ rr1(X1,X2)
    | ~ cSatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( rr1(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | rr1(esk3_2(X1,X3),esk4_2(X1,X3))
    | cSatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( rr1(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | rinvR(X3,esk3_2(X1,X3))
    | cSatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( rinvR(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1))
    | rr1(esk3_2(X2,X3),esk4_2(X2,X3))
    | cSatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1)
    | ~ rr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( cp(esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | rr1(esk3_2(X1,X3),esk4_2(X1,X3))
    | cSatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( rinvR(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1))
    | rinvR(X3,esk3_2(X2,X3))
    | cSatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1)
    | ~ rr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( rr1(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | cSatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ cp(esk4_2(X1,X3))
    | ~ rr(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( rinvR(X1,esk5_2(X2,X1))
    | cSatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rr(X2,X1)
    | ~ cp(esk4_2(X2,X3))
    | ~ rr(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( cp(esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | cSatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ cp(esk4_2(X1,X3))
    | ~ rr(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( cp(esk6_2(X1,X2))
    | rinvR(X3,esk3_2(X1,X3))
    | cSatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rr(X1,X2)
    | ~ rr(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( rr(X2,X1)
    | ~ rinvR(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ xsd_string(X1)
    | ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( xsd_integer(X1)
    | xsd_string(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ~ cowlNothing(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    cSatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_15_58383),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_4]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem    : KRS039+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 21:58:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.51  Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 7052 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.53  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 7067 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.53  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  # No proof found!
% 0.23/0.53  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.53  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.23/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.23/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 0.23/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 23
% 0.23/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 23
% 0.23/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.23/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 18
% 0.23/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.23/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.23/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 18
% 0.23/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 22
% 0.23/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.23/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.23/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 20
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.23/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 175
% 0.23/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.23/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.23/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1583
% 0.23/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 294
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.53  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.23/0.53  
% 0.23/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.53  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.23/0.53  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.23/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.23/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------