TSTP Solution File: KRS016-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : KRS016-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:48:35 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16045/KRS/KRS016-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7] [nf = 0] [nu = 4] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 45] [nf = 0] [nu = 8] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 141] [nf = 8] [nu = 12] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 685] [nf = 18] [nu = 97] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2479] [nf = 88] [nu = 349] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7675] [nf = 274] [nu = 1307] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 22573] [nf = 696] [nu = 3779] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 125288] [nf = 4100] [nu = 23201] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 621168] [nf = 22830] [nu = 161479] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 2320324] [nf = 77864] [nu = 589063] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 18 secs [nr = 8494310] [nf = 360804] [nu = 1927533] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14634046] [nf = 667831] [nu = 3365942] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14634110] [nf = 667831] [nu = 3365960] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14634394] [nf = 667839] [nu = 3366044] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14635316] [nf = 667849] [nu = 3366312] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14638556] [nf = 667943] [nu = 3367012] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14650716] [nf = 668237] [nu = 3370728] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14689120] [nf = 668943] [nu = 3381314] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 14832594] [nf = 673815] [nu = 3413194] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 15348056] [nf = 692955] [nu = 3559352] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 36 secs [nr = 17047212] [nf = 747989] [nu = 3986936] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 49 secs [nr = 23221198] [nf = 1030929] [nu = 5325406] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 98 secs [nr = 44843918] [nf = 2099123] [nu = 10952288] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 257 secs [nr = 117452476] [nf = 5430377] [nu = 27828340] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 144540996
% 	resolvents: 138333152	factors: 6207844
% Number of unit clauses generated: 33158402
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 22.94
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2		[1] = 2		[4] = 2		[8] = 2		[9] = 4		
% Total = 12
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 33158402	[2] = 61849668	[3] = 49532926	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [1] d_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [2] r1most_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [3] s1most_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [4] equalish_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] r_2		(+)0	(-)4
% [6] s_2		(+)0	(-)4
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)4	(-)8
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 12
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 163001273
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 9600786
% Number of successful unifications: 144540996
% Number of unification failures: 76004079
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 583875064
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 608965453
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 22963597
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 17
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 26
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.65
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 48
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 220545075
% ConstructUnitClause() = 22963607
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 22.58 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 481803
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------