TSTP Solution File: KRS008-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS008-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : KRS008-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 14:52:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 54 Number of unprocessed: 54
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36  # 54 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.36  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36  # 52 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.12/0.36  # Returning from population with 26 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36  # We now have 26 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.46  # 19873 Satisfiable branch
% 0.18/0.46  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.46  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.46  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.46  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (e(exist))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~f(exist))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (r2most(X1)|~e(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (c(X1)|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (s1most(X1)|~d(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (s2least(X1)|~c(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_64, plain, (d(X1)|~s1most(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (~equalish(u1r2(X1),u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (c(u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (d(u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_66, plain, (s1most(X1)|~equalish(u3r2(X1),u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (r(X1,u4r2(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (r(X1,u4r1(X1))|~e(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (r2most(X1)|~equalish(u5r2(X1),u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (r2most(X1)|~equalish(u5r3(X1),u5r2(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (r2most(X1)|~equalish(u5r3(X1),u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r2(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_67, plain, (s1most(X1)|s(X1,u3r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (s(X1,u1r2(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (s(X1,u1r1(X1))|~s2least(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (r2most(X1)|r(X1,u5r2(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (r2most(X1)|r(X1,u5r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_81, plain, (r2most(X1)|r(X1,u5r3(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_96, plain, (d(u6r4(X1))|c(u6r2(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_95, plain, (d(u6r3(X1))|c(u6r2(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (d(u6r4(X1))|c(u6r1(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (d(u6r3(X1))|c(u6r1(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_98, plain, (r(X1,u6r4(X1))|c(u6r2(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_97, plain, (r(X1,u6r3(X1))|c(u6r2(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_84, plain, (f(X1)|~equalish(u6r2(X1),u6r1(X1))|~equalish(u6r4(X1),u6r3(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_94, plain, (c(u6r2(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r4(X1),u6r3(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (c(u6r1(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r4(X1),u6r3(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (d(u6r4(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r2(X1),u6r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (r(X1,u6r4(X1))|c(u6r1(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_85, plain, (d(u6r3(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r2(X1),u6r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (r(X1,u6r2(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r4(X1),u6r3(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_99, plain, (r(X1,u6r1(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r4(X1),u6r3(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (r(X1,u6r4(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r2(X1),u6r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_92, plain, (r(X1,u6r3(X1))|c(u6r1(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (r(X1,u6r2(X1))|d(u6r4(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (e(X1)|~r2most(X1)|~r(X1,X2)|~r(X1,X3)|~d(X2)|~c(X3))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~s1most(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (r(X1,u6r3(X1))|f(X1)|~equalish(u6r2(X1),u6r1(X1)))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|s2least(X3)|~s(X3,X2)|~s(X3,X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_101, plain, (r(X1,u6r1(X1))|d(u6r4(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_105, plain, (r(X1,u6r2(X1))|d(u6r3(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_100, plain, (r(X1,u6r1(X1))|d(u6r3(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_108, plain, (r(X1,u6r4(X1))|r(X1,u6r2(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_107, plain, (r(X1,u6r3(X1))|r(X1,u6r2(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_103, plain, (r(X1,u6r4(X1))|r(X1,u6r1(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_102, plain, (r(X1,u6r3(X1))|r(X1,u6r1(X1))|f(X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_83, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~r(X3,X2)|~r(X3,X1)|~c(X2)|~c(X1)|~f(X3))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_82, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~r(X3,X2)|~r(X3,X1)|~d(X2)|~d(X1)|~f(X3))).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|equalish(X1,X3)|equalish(X2,X3)|~r2most(X4)|~r(X4,X3)|~r(X4,X2)|~r(X4,X1))).
% 0.18/0.46  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.46  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.46  # Found 4 steps
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~f(exist)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_109, plain, (~f(exist)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_101])).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_221, plain, (r(exist,u6r1(exist))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_74])).
% 0.18/0.46  cnf(i_0_357, plain, (~r(exist,u6r1(exist))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_221])).
% 0.18/0.46  # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.46  # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.46  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.46  # Child (19873) has found a proof.
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.46  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------