TSTP Solution File: KLE167+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : KLE167+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:26:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  28 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  17   ~;  12   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   5   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0 sgn;  38   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    star: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    strong_iteration: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

fof(additive_associativity,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_associativity) ).

fof(idempotence,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',idempotence) ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
       => leq(multiplication(X4,star(X5)),X4) )
      & leq(X4,multiplication(X4,star(X5))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(star_unfold2,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(one,multiplication(star(X1),X1)) = star(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',star_unfold2) ).

fof(order,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> addition(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',order) ).

fof(distributivity1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',distributivity1) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(additive_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_identity) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(star_induction2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( leq(addition(multiplication(X3,X1),X2),X3)
     => leq(multiplication(X2,star(X1)),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE004+0.ax',star_induction2) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10] : addition(X10,addition(X9,X8)) = addition(addition(X10,X9),X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_associativity]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X12] : addition(X12,X12) = X12,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] :
        ( ( multiplication(X4,X5) = zero
         => leq(multiplication(X4,star(X5)),X4) )
        & leq(X4,multiplication(X4,star(X5))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(addition(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X26] : addition(one,multiplication(star(X26),X26)) = star(X26),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[star_unfold2]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
      | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0))) )
    & ( ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
      | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X38,X39] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X38,X39)
        | addition(X38,X39) = X39 )
      & ( addition(X38,X39) != X39
        | leq(X38,X39) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[order])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] : multiplication(X18,addition(X19,X20)) = addition(multiplication(X18,X19),multiplication(X18,X20)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[distributivity1]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    addition(X1,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    addition(one,multiplication(star(X1),X1)) = star(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X16] : multiplication(X16,one) = X16,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
    | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | addition(X1,X2) != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    addition(one,star(X1)) = star(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X11] : addition(X11,zero) = X11,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : addition(X6,X7) = addition(X7,X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X30,X31,X32] :
      ( ~ leq(addition(multiplication(X32,X30),X31),X32)
      | leq(multiplication(X31,star(X30)),X32) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[star_induction2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero
    | addition(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0))) != multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X1,star(X2))) = multiplication(X1,star(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    addition(X1,zero) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( leq(multiplication(X3,star(X2)),X1)
    | ~ leq(addition(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    multiplication(esk1_0,esk2_0) = zero,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    addition(zero,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
    | ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(multiplication(X1,star(esk2_0)),esk1_0)
    | ~ leq(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(esk1_0,multiplication(esk1_0,star(esk2_0)))
    | ~ leq(esk1_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_23]),c_0_31])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_23]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : KLE167+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 12:13:21 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.57  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.016000 s
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.019000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------