TSTP Solution File: KLE150+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : KLE150+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 12:38:36 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 24 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 21 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 5 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 1 sgn 16 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1] : multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
file('/tmp/tmpjcF8TS/sel_KLE150+1.p_1',left_annihilation) ).
fof(4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
file('/tmp/tmpjcF8TS/sel_KLE150+1.p_1',additive_commutativity) ).
fof(10,axiom,
! [X1] : strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
file('/tmp/tmpjcF8TS/sel_KLE150+1.p_1',infty_unfold1) ).
fof(17,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
file('/tmp/tmpjcF8TS/sel_KLE150+1.p_1',multiplicative_associativity) ).
fof(19,conjecture,
! [X4] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)),
file('/tmp/tmpjcF8TS/sel_KLE150+1.p_1',goals) ).
fof(20,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X4] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[19]) ).
fof(21,plain,
! [X2] : multiplication(zero,X2) = zero,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
multiplication(zero,X1) = zero,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
fof(27,plain,
! [X3,X4] : addition(X3,X4) = addition(X4,X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
fof(41,plain,
! [X2] : strong_iteration(X2) = addition(multiplication(X2,strong_iteration(X2)),one),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
strong_iteration(X1) = addition(multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1)),one),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).
fof(58,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] : multiplication(X4,multiplication(X5,X6)) = multiplication(multiplication(X4,X5),X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
cnf(59,plain,
multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)) = multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58]) ).
fof(62,negated_conjecture,
? [X4] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X4,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(X4,zero)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(63,negated_conjecture,
? [X5] : strong_iteration(multiplication(X5,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(X5,zero)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
fof(64,negated_conjecture,
strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[63]) ).
cnf(65,negated_conjecture,
strong_iteration(multiplication(esk1_0,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(esk1_0,zero)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
cnf(112,plain,
addition(one,multiplication(X1,strong_iteration(X1))) = strong_iteration(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[42,28,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(115,plain,
addition(one,multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X2))))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,X2)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[112,59,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(3021,plain,
addition(one,multiplication(X1,zero)) = strong_iteration(multiplication(X1,zero)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[115,22,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(5714,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[65,3021,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(5715,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[5714,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(5716,negated_conjecture,
$false,
5715,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE150+1.p
% --creating new selector for [KLE004+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpjcF8TS/sel_KLE150+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem KLE150+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE150+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KLE/KLE150+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------