TSTP Solution File: KLE150+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KLE150+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.43s 0.99s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KLE150+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 07:21:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.98  Process 19227 was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.98  Thu Jun 16 07:21:53 2022
% 0.43/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_19074_n008.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_19074_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.98  
% 0.43/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.98  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  12 (all A addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  13 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,C),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),B),C))) # label(star_induction1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.98  14 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(C,A),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(B,star(A)),C))) # label(star_induction2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  16 (all A all B all C (leq(C,addition(multiplication(A,C),B)) -> leq(C,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B)))) # label(infty_coinduction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  17 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))) # label(isolation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  18 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  19 -(all X0 strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Auto_denials:
% 0.43/0.99    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/0.99  Function symbol KB weights:  one=1. zero=1. c1=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. star=1. strong_iteration=1.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds: goals.
% 0.43/0.99  % Length of proof is 21.
% 0.43/0.99  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.43/0.99  % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.43/0.99  % Given clauses 37.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  19 -(all X0 strong_iteration(multiplication(X0,zero)) = addition(one,multiplication(X0,zero))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.99  24 multiplication(zero,A) = zero # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 0.43/0.99  25 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.43/0.99  26 star(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.43/0.99  27 addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A).  [copy(26),flip(a)].
% 0.43/0.99  30 strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.43/0.99  31 addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A).  [copy(30),rewrite([25(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.43/0.99  36 multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.43/0.99  41 strong_iteration(multiplication(c1,zero)) != addition(one,multiplication(c1,zero)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(19)].
% 0.43/0.99  42 addition(one,multiplication(c1,zero)) != strong_iteration(multiplication(c1,zero)) # answer(goals).  [copy(41),flip(a)].
% 0.43/0.99  56 addition(one,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,star(multiplication(A,B))))) = star(multiplication(A,B)).  [para(36(a,1),27(a,1,2))].
% 0.43/0.99  57 addition(one,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,strong_iteration(multiplication(A,B))))) = strong_iteration(multiplication(A,B)).  [para(36(a,1),31(a,1,2))].
% 0.43/0.99  120 addition(one,multiplication(A,zero)) = star(multiplication(A,zero)).  [para(24(a,1),56(a,1,2,2))].
% 0.43/0.99  128 strong_iteration(multiplication(c1,zero)) != star(multiplication(c1,zero)) # answer(goals).  [back_rewrite(42),rewrite([120(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.43/0.99  130 strong_iteration(multiplication(A,zero)) = star(multiplication(A,zero)).  [para(24(a,1),57(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([120(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.43/0.99  131 $F # answer(goals).  [resolve(130,a,128,a)].
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Given=37. Generated=349. Kept=100. proofs=1.
% 0.43/0.99  Usable=32. Sos=59. Demods=42. Limbo=0, Disabled=28. Hints=0.
% 0.43/0.99  Megabytes=0.14.
% 0.43/0.99  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.43/0.99  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.43/0.99  
% 0.43/0.99  Process 19227 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 07:21:53 2022
% 0.43/0.99  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------