TSTP Solution File: KLE146+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : KLE146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:29:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  14   ~;   5   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  39   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f159,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f156]) ).

fof(f156,plain,
    strong_iteration(sK0) != strong_iteration(sK0),
    inference(superposition,[],[f73,f140]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ! [X15] : addition(one,strong_iteration(X15)) = strong_iteration(X15),
    inference(superposition,[],[f107,f86]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X2] : addition(one,multiplication(X2,strong_iteration(X2))) = strong_iteration(X2),
    inference(superposition,[],[f58,f52]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X0,addition(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f45,f46]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X1,addition(X0,X2)) = addition(addition(X1,X0),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X1,addition(X0,X2)) = addition(addition(X1,X0),X2),
    inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X2,X1] : addition(addition(X2,X0),X1) = addition(X2,addition(X0,X1)),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X0] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(addition(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    addition(one,strong_iteration(sK0)) != strong_iteration(sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f47,f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ~ leq(one,strong_iteration(sK0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ~ leq(one,strong_iteration(sK0)),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f31,f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ leq(one,strong_iteration(X0))
   => ~ leq(one,strong_iteration(sK0)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ? [X0] : ~ leq(one,strong_iteration(X0)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ~ ! [X0] : leq(one,strong_iteration(X0)),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3] : leq(one,strong_iteration(X3)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X3] : leq(one,strong_iteration(X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X1,X0)
      | addition(X1,X0) != X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( addition(X1,X0) = X0
        | ~ leq(X1,X0) )
      & ( leq(X1,X0)
        | addition(X1,X0) != X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
        | ~ leq(X0,X1) )
      & ( leq(X0,X1)
        | addition(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
    <=> leq(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',order) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : KLE146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 00:42:15 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  % (27572)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (27581)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Time elapsed: 0.101 s
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (27580)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  % (27582)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (27588)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.51  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.51  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Time elapsed: 0.120 s
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  % (27581)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  % (27571)Success in time 0.157 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------