TSTP Solution File: KLE144+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : KLE144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:51:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 243.79s 191.52s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : KLE144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:37:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.62/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.62/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.62/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.62/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.62/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.62/0.59  
% 0.62/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.62/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.62/0.59  
% 0.62/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.62/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.62/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.62/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.62/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.62/0.59  
% 0.62/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.62/0.59  
% 0.62/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.62/0.95  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.33/1.24  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.77/5.93  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 18.77/5.97  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 19.17/6.06  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.17/6.10  Prover 1: gave up
% 19.17/6.10  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 19.64/6.12  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 19.64/6.17  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 19.64/6.17  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 26.67/7.85  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 26.67/7.87  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 27.09/7.92  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 27.09/7.94  Prover 3: gave up
% 27.09/7.94  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 27.09/7.97  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 27.67/8.02  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 27.67/8.02  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 34.24/10.25  Prover 0: stopped
% 34.70/10.45  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 34.70/10.46  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 34.70/10.49  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 51.48/23.94  Prover 5: stopped
% 51.65/24.14  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 51.65/24.16  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 51.84/24.20  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 51.97/24.20  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 145.48/106.06  Prover 6: stopped
% 145.71/106.27  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 145.71/106.28  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 145.71/106.31  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 145.71/106.32  Prover 7: gave up
% 145.71/106.32  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 146.07/106.34  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 146.07/106.36  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 146.07/106.37  Prover 8: gave up
% 146.07/106.37  Prover 9: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=completeFrugal
% 146.07/106.38  Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 146.23/106.40  Prover 9: Proving ...
% 166.55/122.63  Prover 9: stopped
% 166.95/122.98  Prover 10: Options:  -triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 166.95/123.00  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 167.10/123.04  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 167.10/123.04  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 198.70/151.05  Prover 2: stopped
% 198.88/151.25  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 198.88/151.27  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 199.00/151.29  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 199.07/151.30  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 199.16/151.32  Prover 11: gave up
% 199.16/151.32  Prover 12: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 199.22/151.33  Prover 12: Preprocessing ...
% 199.22/151.36  Prover 12: Constructing countermodel ...
% 199.22/151.37  Prover 12: gave up
% 199.22/151.37  Prover 13: Options:  -triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 199.22/151.39  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 199.22/151.40  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 199.22/151.40  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 243.79/191.52  Prover 13: proved (40144ms)
% 243.79/191.52  Prover 4: stopped
% 243.79/191.52  Prover 10: stopped
% 243.79/191.52  
% 243.79/191.52  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 243.79/191.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 243.79/191.52  
% 243.79/191.52  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------