TSTP Solution File: KLE144+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KLE144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.40s 1.71s
% Output   : Refutation 1.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : KLE144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 16:43:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.69/1.00  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.69/1.00  Process 6746 was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.69/1.00  Thu Jun 16 16:43:27 2022
% 0.69/1.00  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_6593_n025.cluster.edu".
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_6593_n025.cluster.edu
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.69/1.00  set(auto2).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.69/1.00      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.69/1.00      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.69/1.00  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.69/1.00  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.69/1.00  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.69/1.00  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.69/1.00  clear(print_given).
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (19 formulas)
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.69/1.00  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  12 (all A addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  13 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,C),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),B),C))) # label(star_induction1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  14 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(C,A),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(B,star(A)),C))) # label(star_induction2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  16 (all A all B all C (leq(C,addition(multiplication(A,C),B)) -> leq(C,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B)))) # label(infty_coinduction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  17 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))) # label(isolation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  18 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  19 -(all X0 strong_iteration(star(X0)) = strong_iteration(one)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Auto_denials:
% 1.40/1.71    % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Term ordering decisions:
% 1.40/1.71  Function symbol KB weights:  one=1. zero=1. c1=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. star=1. strong_iteration=1.
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Low Water (keep): wt=43.000, iters=3387
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Low Water (keep): wt=33.000, iters=3440
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Low Water (keep): wt=32.000, iters=3369
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.40/1.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.40/1.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  % Proof 1 at 0.69 (+ 0.03) seconds: goals.
% 1.40/1.71  % Length of proof is 95.
% 1.40/1.71  % Level of proof is 23.
% 1.40/1.71  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 1.40/1.71  % Given clauses 587.
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  10 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  11 (all A addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  12 (all A addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  13 (all A all B all C (leq(addition(multiplication(A,C),B),C) -> leq(multiplication(star(A),B),C))) # label(star_induction1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  15 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one)) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  16 (all A all B all C (leq(C,addition(multiplication(A,C),B)) -> leq(C,multiplication(strong_iteration(A),B)))) # label(infty_coinduction) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  17 (all A strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero))) # label(isolation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  18 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  19 -(all X0 strong_iteration(star(X0)) = strong_iteration(one)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 1.40/1.71  20 addition(A,zero) = A # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 1.40/1.71  21 addition(A,A) = A # label(idempotence) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 1.40/1.71  22 multiplication(A,one) = A # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 1.40/1.71  23 multiplication(one,A) = A # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 1.40/1.71  24 multiplication(zero,A) = zero # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 1.40/1.71  25 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 1.40/1.71  26 star(A) = addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) # label(star_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 1.40/1.71  27 addition(one,multiplication(A,star(A))) = star(A).  [copy(26),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  28 star(A) = addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) # label(star_unfold2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 1.40/1.71  29 addition(one,multiplication(star(A),A)) = star(A).  [copy(28),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  30 strong_iteration(A) = addition(multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A)),one) # label(infty_unfold1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(15)].
% 1.40/1.71  31 addition(one,multiplication(A,strong_iteration(A))) = strong_iteration(A).  [copy(30),rewrite([25(5)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  32 strong_iteration(A) = addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) # label(isolation) # label(axiom).  [clausify(17)].
% 1.40/1.71  33 addition(star(A),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),zero)) = strong_iteration(A).  [copy(32),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  34 addition(addition(A,B),C) = addition(A,addition(B,C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 1.40/1.71  35 addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(C,addition(A,B)).  [copy(34),rewrite([25(2)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  36 multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C) = multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 1.40/1.71  37 multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) # label(distributivity1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 1.40/1.71  38 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)).  [copy(37),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  39 multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) # label(distributivity2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 1.40/1.71  40 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B).  [copy(39),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  41 strong_iteration(star(c1)) != strong_iteration(one) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals).  [clausify(19)].
% 1.40/1.71  42 -leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) = B # label(order) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 1.40/1.71  43 leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) != B # label(order) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 1.40/1.71  44 -leq(addition(multiplication(A,B),C),B) | leq(multiplication(star(A),C),B) # label(star_induction1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
% 1.40/1.71  45 -leq(addition(A,multiplication(B,C)),C) | leq(multiplication(star(B),A),C).  [copy(44),rewrite([25(2)])].
% 1.40/1.71  48 -leq(A,addition(multiplication(B,A),C)) | leq(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(B),C)) # label(infty_coinduction) # label(axiom).  [clausify(16)].
% 1.40/1.71  49 -leq(A,addition(B,multiplication(C,A))) | leq(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(C),B)).  [copy(48),rewrite([25(2)])].
% 1.40/1.71  53 strong_iteration(zero) = one.  [para(24(a,1),31(a,1,2)),rewrite([20(3)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  54 addition(A,addition(A,B)) = addition(A,B).  [para(35(a,1),21(a,1)),rewrite([25(1),25(2),35(2,R),21(1),25(3)])].
% 1.40/1.71  55 addition(one,multiplication(A,multiplication(B,star(multiplication(A,B))))) = star(multiplication(A,B)).  [para(36(a,1),27(a,1,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  57 multiplication(A,addition(B,one)) = addition(A,multiplication(A,B)).  [para(22(a,1),38(a,1,1)),rewrite([25(4)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  62 multiplication(addition(A,one),B) = addition(B,multiplication(A,B)).  [para(23(a,1),40(a,1,1)),rewrite([25(4)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  63 addition(A,multiplication(B,multiplication(star(B),A))) = multiplication(star(B),A).  [para(27(a,1),40(a,2,1)),rewrite([23(2),36(3)])].
% 1.40/1.71  65 addition(A,multiplication(B,multiplication(strong_iteration(B),A))) = multiplication(strong_iteration(B),A).  [para(31(a,1),40(a,2,1)),rewrite([23(2),36(3)])].
% 1.40/1.71  69 leq(A,A).  [hyper(43,b,21,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  78 -leq(addition(A,B),one) | leq(multiplication(star(B),A),one).  [para(22(a,1),45(a,1,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  96 -leq(A,addition(A,B)) | leq(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),B)).  [para(23(a,1),49(a,2,2)),rewrite([25(1)])].
% 1.40/1.71  98 -leq(A,star(A)) | leq(A,strong_iteration(star(A))).  [para(29(a,1),49(a,2)),rewrite([22(6)])].
% 1.40/1.71  109 leq(A,addition(A,B)).  [hyper(43,b,54,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  110 addition(one,star(A)) = star(A).  [para(27(a,1),54(a,1,2)),rewrite([27(7)])].
% 1.40/1.71  117 leq(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,addition(B,C))).  [para(38(a,1),109(a,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  119 addition(one,multiplication(A,zero)) = star(multiplication(A,zero)).  [para(24(a,1),55(a,1,2,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  194 leq(multiplication(A,B),addition(A,multiplication(A,B))).  [para(57(a,1),117(a,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  245 addition(A,addition(B,multiplication(C,multiplication(star(C),A)))) = addition(B,multiplication(star(C),A)).  [para(63(a,1),35(a,2,2)),rewrite([25(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  250 multiplication(star(A),A) = multiplication(A,star(A)).  [para(63(a,1),57(a,2)),rewrite([25(4),29(4)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  265 leq(multiplication(A,star(A)),star(A)).  [para(55(a,1),194(a,2)),rewrite([23(3),23(4),23(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  278 multiplication(addition(A,one),star(A)) = star(A).  [hyper(42,a,265,a),rewrite([25(4),62(4,R)])].
% 1.40/1.71  386 addition(A,star(A)) = star(A).  [para(278(a,1),57(a,2,2)),rewrite([25(5),110(5),278(4),25(5),35(5),25(4),35(5,R),25(4),110(4)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  395 leq(A,star(A)).  [hyper(43,b,386,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  399 leq(A,strong_iteration(star(A))).  [hyper(98,a,395,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  400 addition(A,strong_iteration(star(A))) = strong_iteration(star(A)).  [hyper(42,a,399,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  519 -leq(A,one) | leq(multiplication(A,star(A)),one).  [para(21(a,1),78(a,1)),rewrite([250(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  596 leq(star(one),one).  [hyper(519,a,69,a),rewrite([23(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  600 star(one) = one.  [hyper(42,a,596,a),rewrite([25(4),386(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  620 star(multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero)) = strong_iteration(one).  [para(600(a,1),33(a,1,1)),rewrite([119(6)])].
% 1.40/1.71  657 addition(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(one),A).  [para(620(a,1),63(a,1,2,2,1)),rewrite([36(8),24(7),620(10)])].
% 1.40/1.71  659 multiplication(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(one)) = strong_iteration(one).  [para(620(a,1),278(a,1,2)),rewrite([25(6),657(6),22(4),620(10)])].
% 1.40/1.71  661 multiplication(strong_iteration(one),strong_iteration(strong_iteration(one))) = strong_iteration(strong_iteration(one)).  [para(620(a,1),400(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([25(8),657(8),620(11)])].
% 1.40/1.71  921 leq(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),B)).  [hyper(96,a,109,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  922 addition(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(one),B)) = multiplication(strong_iteration(one),B).  [hyper(42,a,921,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  924 multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero) = multiplication(strong_iteration(one),A).  [back_rewrite(657),rewrite([922(5)])].
% 1.40/1.71  925 multiplication(strong_iteration(one),zero) = strong_iteration(strong_iteration(one)).  [back_rewrite(661),rewrite([924(6,R)])].
% 1.40/1.71  926 strong_iteration(strong_iteration(one)) = strong_iteration(one).  [back_rewrite(659),rewrite([924(5,R),925(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  927 multiplication(strong_iteration(one),A) = strong_iteration(one).  [back_rewrite(924),rewrite([925(4),926(3)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  929 addition(A,strong_iteration(one)) = strong_iteration(one).  [back_rewrite(922),rewrite([927(3),927(6)])].
% 1.40/1.71  951 addition(strong_iteration(one),multiplication(A,B)) = strong_iteration(one).  [para(927(a,1),40(a,1,1)),rewrite([25(7),929(7),927(7)])].
% 1.40/1.71  1011 multiplication(strong_iteration(A),strong_iteration(one)) = strong_iteration(one).  [para(951(a,1),65(a,1)),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  6981 leq(A,addition(B,multiplication(star(C),A))).  [para(245(a,1),109(a,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  7037 leq(A,multiplication(strong_iteration(star(B)),C)).  [hyper(49,a,6981,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  7062 leq(A,strong_iteration(star(B))).  [para(22(a,1),7037(a,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  7066 addition(A,strong_iteration(star(B))) = strong_iteration(star(B)).  [hyper(42,a,7062,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  7226 leq(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,strong_iteration(star(C)))).  [para(7066(a,1),117(a,2,2))].
% 1.40/1.71  7332 leq(strong_iteration(one),multiplication(strong_iteration(A),strong_iteration(star(B)))).  [para(1011(a,1),7226(a,1))].
% 1.40/1.71  7346 multiplication(strong_iteration(A),strong_iteration(star(B))) = strong_iteration(one).  [hyper(42,a,7332,a),rewrite([951(7)]),flip(a)].
% 1.40/1.71  7379 strong_iteration(star(A)) = strong_iteration(one).  [para(53(a,1),7346(a,1,1)),rewrite([23(4)])].
% 1.40/1.71  7380 $F # answer(goals).  [resolve(7379,a,41,a)].
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Given=587. Generated=26750. Kept=7350. proofs=1.
% 1.40/1.71  Usable=483. Sos=5831. Demods=1086. Limbo=4, Disabled=1051. Hints=0.
% 1.40/1.71  Megabytes=7.14.
% 1.40/1.71  User_CPU=0.69, System_CPU=0.03, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  THEOREM PROVED
% 1.40/1.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.40/1.71  
% 1.40/1.71  Process 6746 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 16:43:28 2022
% 1.40/1.71  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------