TSTP Solution File: KLE140+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : KLE140+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 13:12:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 9.94s 1.77s
% Output   : Refutation 9.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  14   ~;   7   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (  66   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f145193,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f145192,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ~ leq(strong_iteration(sK0),strong_iteration(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(sK0),strong_iteration(sK1))
    & leq(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f23,f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(X0),strong_iteration(X1))
        & leq(X0,X1) )
   => ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(sK0),strong_iteration(sK1))
      & leq(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(strong_iteration(X0),strong_iteration(X1))
      & leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( leq(X0,X1)
       => leq(strong_iteration(X0),strong_iteration(X1)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3,X4] :
        ( leq(X3,X4)
       => leq(strong_iteration(X3),strong_iteration(X4)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( leq(X3,X4)
     => leq(strong_iteration(X3),strong_iteration(X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(f145192,plain,
    leq(strong_iteration(sK0),strong_iteration(sK1)),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f144902,f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(X0,one) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(f144902,plain,
    leq(strong_iteration(sK0),multiplication(strong_iteration(sK1),one)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f12294,f6986]) ).

fof(f6986,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,addition(X2,multiplication(X0,X1)))
      | leq(X1,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f48,f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X2,addition(multiplication(X0,X2),X1))
      | leq(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X1))
      | ~ leq(X2,addition(multiplication(X0,X2),X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X2,addition(multiplication(X0,X2),X1))
     => leq(X2,multiplication(strong_iteration(X0),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',infty_coinduction) ).

fof(f12294,plain,
    leq(strong_iteration(sK0),addition(one,multiplication(sK1,strong_iteration(sK0)))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f6511,f138]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(one,multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f39,f41]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : strong_iteration(X0) = addition(multiplication(X0,strong_iteration(X0)),one),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',infty_unfold1) ).

fof(f6511,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : leq(addition(X1,multiplication(sK0,X0)),addition(X1,multiplication(sK1,X0))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f384,f5782]) ).

fof(f5782,plain,
    ! [X0] : multiplication(sK1,X0) = addition(multiplication(sK0,X0),multiplication(sK1,X0)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f5740,f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( leq(X0,X1)
        | addition(X0,X1) != X1 )
      & ( addition(X0,X1) = X1
        | ~ leq(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
    <=> addition(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',order) ).

fof(f5740,plain,
    ! [X0] : leq(multiplication(sK0,X0),multiplication(sK1,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f5465,f59]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    sK1 = addition(sK0,sK1),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f30,f42]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    leq(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f5465,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : leq(multiplication(X0,X1),multiplication(addition(X0,X2),X1)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f338,f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : multiplication(addition(X0,X1),X2) = addition(multiplication(X0,X2),multiplication(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distributivity2) ).

fof(f338,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : leq(X0,addition(X0,X1)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f190,f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( addition(X0,X1) != X1
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : addition(X0,X1) = addition(X0,addition(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f44,f36]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : addition(X0,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : addition(X2,addition(X1,X0)) = addition(addition(X2,X1),X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] : addition(X0,addition(X1,X2)) = addition(addition(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_associativity) ).

fof(f384,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : leq(addition(X0,X1),addition(X0,addition(X1,X2))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f338,f44]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : KLE140+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 04:56:11 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.35  % (27849)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.36  % (27855)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (27852)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.37  % (27853)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (27851)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (27850)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (27852)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (27854)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (27856)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.38  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.38  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.39  TRYING [4]
% 0.21/0.40  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.43  TRYING [5]
% 0.21/0.44  TRYING [4]
% 0.21/0.52  TRYING [6]
% 1.47/0.58  TRYING [5]
% 2.42/0.70  TRYING [7]
% 3.56/0.90  TRYING [6]
% 5.23/1.11  TRYING [8]
% 7.85/1.47  TRYING [1]
% 7.85/1.47  TRYING [2]
% 7.85/1.47  TRYING [3]
% 7.85/1.48  TRYING [4]
% 8.34/1.53  TRYING [5]
% 8.66/1.64  TRYING [6]
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)First to succeed.
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 9.94/1.77  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 9.94/1.77  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)------------------------------
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)Termination reason: Refutation
% 9.94/1.77  
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)Memory used [KB]: 23727
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)Time elapsed: 1.402 s
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)Instructions burned: 4463 (million)
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)------------------------------
% 9.94/1.77  % (27856)------------------------------
% 9.94/1.77  % (27849)Success in time 1.388 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------