TSTP Solution File: KLE118+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KLE118+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:27:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.66s 1.85s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : KLE118+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 07:53:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Thu Jun 16 07:53:41 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11964.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.36  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] {-} addition(A,B)=addition(B,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [copy,63,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 55
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 3
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 15
% 0.20/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 19
% 0.20/0.39     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.20/0.39     distinct function count: 12
% 0.20/0.39     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.66/1.84  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.66/1.84  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.66/1.84  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 9 [ 9 1 741 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 12 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 13 [ 14 0 1578 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 14 [ 19 0 115 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 15 [ 15 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 16 [ 12 0 1086 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 17 [ 1 0 1400 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 18 [ 21 0 123 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 19 [ 20 1 122 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 20 [ 23 0 327 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 21 [ 26 0 402 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 22 [ 14 1 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 23 [ 20 0 126 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 24 [ 22 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  true clauses given           6      (16.7%)
% 1.66/1.84  false clauses given         30
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.66/1.84     4  1         0
% 1.66/1.84     6  0         4
% 1.66/1.84     7  1         0
% 1.66/1.84     8  8         2
% 1.66/1.84     9  4         8
% 1.66/1.84    10  6         4
% 1.66/1.84    11  14        2
% 1.66/1.84    12  12        1
% 1.66/1.84    13  3         0
% 1.66/1.84    14  5         0
% 1.66/1.84    15  2         0
% 1.66/1.84    16  2         0
% 1.66/1.84    17  4         1
% 1.66/1.84    18  8         0
% 1.66/1.84    19  2         1
% 1.66/1.84    20  3         1
% 1.66/1.84    21  1         2
% 1.66/1.84    22  2         0
% 1.66/1.84    24  6         0
% 1.66/1.84    26  2         0
% 1.66/1.84    31  2         0
% 1.66/1.84    34  2         0
% 1.66/1.84  tot:  90        26      (22.4% true)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  Model 24 [ 22 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 1.66/1.84  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 1.66/1.84  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 1.66/1.84  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  
% 1.66/1.84  The job finished Thu Jun 16 07:53:43 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------