## TSTP Solution File: KLE089+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

```%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : KLE089+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 07:54:52 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 1.00s
% Output   : Solution 1.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16822/KLE089+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16822/KLE089+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 16918
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.012 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(10, axiom,![X4]:multiplication(antidomain(X4),X4)=zero,file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', domain1)).
% fof(12, axiom,![X4]:domain(X4)=antidomain(antidomain(X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', domain4)).
% fof(42, plain,![X5]:multiplication(antidomain(X5),X5)=zero,inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[10])).
% cnf(43,plain,(multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1)=zero),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[42])).
% fof(46, plain,![X5]:domain(X5)=antidomain(antidomain(X5)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[12])).
% cnf(47,plain,(domain(X1)=antidomain(antidomain(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46])).
% cnf(69,negated_conjecture,(multiplication(domain(esk1_0),esk2_0)!=zero),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[68])).
% cnf(72,negated_conjecture,(multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),esk2_0)!=zero),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[69,47,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(4855,negated_conjecture,(multiplication(antidomain(esk2_0),esk2_0)=multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4815,203,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4896,negated_conjecture,(zero=multiplication(antidomain(antidomain(esk1_0)),esk2_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[4855,43,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4897,negated_conjecture,(\$false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[4896,72,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4898,negated_conjecture,(\$false),4897,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 359
% # ...of these trivial                : 64
% # ...subsumed                        : 170
% # ...remaining for further processing: 125
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 5
% # Generated clauses                  : 2658
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1421
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 2657
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 1
% # Current number of processed clauses: 120
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 92
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 1
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 24
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1036
% # ...number of literals in the above : 1354
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 448
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 448
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 54
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 29
% # Backwards rewriting index:   137 leaves,   1.33+/-0.889 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           81 leaves,   1.20+/-0.576 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:          123 leaves,   1.32+/-0.886 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.060 s
% # System time            : 0.006 s
% # Total time             : 0.066 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.19 CPU 0.27 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.19 CPU 0.27 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16822/KLE089+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```