TSTP Solution File: KLE084-10 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : KLE084-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 01:57:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 42.37s 5.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 42.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : KLE084-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 10:09:02 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.38 #
% 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 22 Number of unprocessed: 22
% 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.38 # 22 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.38 # Found 22 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.38 # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.38 # 22 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.38
% 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.13/0.38 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.13/0.38 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 40 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.38 # We now have 40 tableaux to operate on
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 42.37/5.81 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 42.37/5.81 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 42.37/5.81 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 42.37/5.81 # Begin clausification derivation
% 42.37/5.81
% 42.37/5.81 # End clausification derivation
% 42.37/5.81 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (multiplication(X1,zero)=zero)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (multiplication(zero,X1)=zero)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (addition(X1,zero)=X1)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (multiplication(X1,one)=X1)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (multiplication(one,X1)=X1)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (addition(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (multiplication(X1,coantidomain(X1))=zero)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (multiplication(antidomain(X1),X1)=zero)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (addition(antidomain(X1),antidomain(antidomain(X1)))=one)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (addition(coantidomain(X1),coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)))=one)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (addition(addition(X1,X2),X3)=addition(X1,addition(X2,X3)))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (multiplication(multiplication(X1,X2),X3)=multiplication(X1,multiplication(X2,X3)))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3))=multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (ifeq2(addition(X1,X2),X2,leq(X1,X2),true)=true)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (ifeq(leq(X1,X2),true,addition(X1,X2),X2)=X2)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X3,X2))=multiplication(addition(X1,X3),X2))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (addition(antidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))))=antidomain(multiplication(X1,antidomain(antidomain(X2)))))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (addition(coantidomain(multiplication(X1,X2)),coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X2)))=coantidomain(multiplication(coantidomain(coantidomain(X1)),X2)))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (addition(X1,X2)=addition(X2,X1))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(sK2_goals_X0,antidomain(antidomain(sK1_goals_X1)))))!=antidomain(antidomain(multiplication(sK2_goals_X0,sK1_goals_X1))))).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 42.37/5.81 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 42.37/5.81 # Begin printing tableau
% 42.37/5.81 # Found 6 steps
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (multiplication(X6,zero)=zero), inference(start_rule)).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (multiplication(X6,zero)=zero), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_56])).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_103, plain, (multiplication(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_36])).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_101, plain, (addition(multiplication(X6,zero),multiplication(zero,zero))=addition(zero,zero)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_53])).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_120, plain, (addition(zero,zero)!=zero), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 42.37/5.81 cnf(i_0_118, plain, (addition(multiplication(X6,zero),multiplication(zero,zero))=zero), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_118, ...])).
% 42.37/5.81 # End printing tableau
% 42.37/5.81 # SZS output end
% 42.37/5.81 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 43.17/5.82 # Child (31475) has found a proof.
% 43.17/5.82
% 43.17/5.82 # Proof search is over...
% 43.17/5.82 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------