TSTP Solution File: KLE070+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : KLE070+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:25:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  19 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn;  18   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    addition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    zero: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    multiplication: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    one: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    domain: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] : addition(domain(X4),multiplication(domain(X4),domain(X5))) = domain(X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(right_distributivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',right_distributivity) ).

fof(multiplicative_right_identity,axiom,
    ! [X1] : multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',multiplicative_right_identity) ).

fof(additive_commutativity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+0.ax',additive_commutativity) ).

fof(domain3,axiom,
    ! [X4] : addition(domain(X4),one) = one,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KLE001+5.ax',domain3) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X4,X5] : addition(domain(X4),multiplication(domain(X4),domain(X5))) = domain(X4),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20] : multiplication(X18,addition(X19,X20)) = addition(multiplication(X18,X19),multiplication(X18,X20)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[right_distributivity]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X16] : multiplication(X16,one) = X16,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_right_identity]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] : addition(X6,X7) = addition(X7,X6),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[additive_commutativity]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X31] : addition(domain(X31),one) = one,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[domain3]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(esk1_0),multiplication(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0))) != domain(esk1_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    multiplication(X1,addition(X2,X3)) = addition(multiplication(X1,X2),multiplication(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    multiplication(X1,one) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    addition(X1,X2) = addition(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    addition(domain(X1),one) = one,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    addition(domain(esk1_0),multiplication(domain(esk1_0),domain(esk2_0))) != domain(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    addition(X1,multiplication(X1,X2)) = multiplication(X1,addition(X2,one)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    addition(one,domain(X1)) = one,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13]),c_0_17]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : KLE070+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 11:43:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.61  % Total time : 0.025000 s
% 0.20/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.61  % Total time : 0.028000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------