TSTP Solution File: KLE069+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : KLE069+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:22:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.92s 1.21s
% Output : Refutation 0.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KLE069+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 10:45:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.44/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.99 Process 21317 was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.99 Thu Jun 16 10:45:25 2022
% 0.44/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_21164_n012.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_21164_n012.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (18 formulas)
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.99
% 0.44/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.99 1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 2 (all C all B all A addition(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(addition(A,B),C)) # label(additive_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 3 (all A addition(A,zero) = A) # label(additive_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 4 (all A addition(A,A) = A) # label(additive_idempotence) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 5 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,multiplication(B,C)) = multiplication(multiplication(A,B),C)) # label(multiplicative_associativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 10 (all A multiplication(A,zero) = zero) # label(right_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 11 (all A multiplication(zero,A) = zero) # label(left_annihilation) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 12 (all A all B (leq(A,B) <-> addition(A,B) = B)) # label(order) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 13 (all X0 addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) # label(domain1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.44/0.99 14 (all X0 all X1 domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) # label(domain2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 15 (all X0 addition(domain(X0),one) = one) # label(domain3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 16 (all X0 all X1 domain(addition(X0,X1)) = addition(domain(X0),domain(X1))) # label(domain5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 17 -(all X0 all X1 multiplication(domain(X0),addition(domain(X0),domain(X1))) = domain(X0)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.92/1.21 18 leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) != B # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)].
% 0.92/1.21 19 -leq(A,B) | addition(A,B) = B # label(order) # label(axiom). [clausify(12)].
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 Auto_denials:
% 0.92/1.21 % copying label goals to answer in negative clause
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 % Assigning unary symbol domain kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (8).
% 0.92/1.21 Function symbol KB weights: zero=1. one=1. c1=1. c2=1. multiplication=1. addition=1. domain=0.
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.92/1.21 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.21 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 % Proof 1 at 0.22 (+ 0.01) seconds: goals.
% 0.92/1.21 % Length of proof is 30.
% 0.92/1.21 % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.92/1.21 % Maximum clause weight is 15.000.
% 0.92/1.21 % Given clauses 93.
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 1 (all A all B addition(A,B) = addition(B,A)) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 6 (all A multiplication(A,one) = A) # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 7 (all A multiplication(one,A) = A) # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 8 (all A all B all C multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C))) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 9 (all A all B all C multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C))) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 13 (all X0 addition(X0,multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) = multiplication(domain(X0),X0)) # label(domain1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 14 (all X0 all X1 domain(multiplication(X0,X1)) = domain(multiplication(X0,domain(X1)))) # label(domain2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 15 (all X0 addition(domain(X0),one) = one) # label(domain3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 17 -(all X0 all X1 multiplication(domain(X0),addition(domain(X0),domain(X1))) = domain(X0)) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.92/1.21 23 multiplication(A,one) = A # label(multiplicative_right_identity) # label(axiom). [clausify(6)].
% 0.92/1.21 24 multiplication(one,A) = A # label(multiplicative_left_identity) # label(axiom). [clausify(7)].
% 0.92/1.21 27 addition(domain(A),one) = one # label(domain3) # label(axiom). [clausify(15)].
% 0.92/1.21 28 addition(A,B) = addition(B,A) # label(additive_commutativity) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.92/1.21 29 domain(multiplication(A,domain(B))) = domain(multiplication(A,B)) # label(domain2) # label(axiom). [clausify(14)].
% 0.92/1.21 34 multiplication(domain(A),A) = addition(A,multiplication(domain(A),A)) # label(domain1) # label(axiom). [clausify(13)].
% 0.92/1.21 35 addition(A,multiplication(domain(A),A)) = multiplication(domain(A),A). [copy(34),flip(a)].
% 0.92/1.21 36 multiplication(A,addition(B,C)) = addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) # label(right_distributivity) # label(axiom). [clausify(8)].
% 0.92/1.21 37 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(A,C)) = multiplication(A,addition(B,C)). [copy(36),flip(a)].
% 0.92/1.21 38 multiplication(addition(A,B),C) = addition(multiplication(A,C),multiplication(B,C)) # label(left_distributivity) # label(axiom). [clausify(9)].
% 0.92/1.21 39 addition(multiplication(A,B),multiplication(C,B)) = multiplication(addition(A,C),B). [copy(38),flip(a)].
% 0.92/1.21 40 domain(c1) != multiplication(domain(c1),addition(domain(c1),domain(c2))) # label(goals) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goals). [clausify(17)].
% 0.92/1.21 41 multiplication(domain(c1),addition(domain(c1),domain(c2))) != domain(c1) # answer(goals). [copy(40),flip(a)].
% 0.92/1.21 44 domain(domain(A)) = domain(A). [para(24(a,1),29(a,1,1)),rewrite([24(4)])].
% 0.92/1.21 59 addition(A,multiplication(A,domain(B))) = A. [para(27(a,1),37(a,2,2)),rewrite([23(4),28(3),23(5)])].
% 0.92/1.21 62 addition(A,multiplication(domain(B),A)) = A. [para(27(a,1),39(a,2,1)),rewrite([24(4),28(3),24(5)])].
% 0.92/1.21 69 multiplication(domain(A),A) = A. [back_rewrite(35),rewrite([62(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.92/1.21 72 multiplication(domain(A),domain(A)) = domain(A). [para(44(a,1),69(a,1,1))].
% 0.92/1.21 85 addition(domain(A),multiplication(domain(A),B)) = multiplication(domain(A),addition(B,domain(A))). [para(72(a,1),37(a,1,1)),rewrite([28(7)])].
% 0.92/1.21 1106 multiplication(domain(A),addition(domain(A),domain(B))) = domain(A). [para(85(a,1),59(a,1)),rewrite([28(4)])].
% 0.92/1.21 1107 $F # answer(goals). [resolve(1106,a,41,a)].
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 Given=93. Generated=8208. Kept=1082. proofs=1.
% 0.92/1.21 Usable=89. Sos=886. Demods=886. Limbo=1, Disabled=124. Hints=0.
% 0.92/1.21 Megabytes=1.49.
% 0.92/1.21 User_CPU=0.22, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.92/1.21 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.92/1.21
% 0.92/1.21 Process 21317 exit (max_proofs) Thu Jun 16 10:45:25 2022
% 0.92/1.21 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------